| zuiaipiugoik | Date: Wednesday, 04 Dec 2013, 1:33 PM | Message # 1 |
|
Lieutenant
Group: Users
Messages: 48
Status: Offline
| Don't assume that bad news isn't good and good news is great. In his latest Against the Grain commentary, CBSNews.com's Dick Meyer shares some wisdom through the president. Sometimes a big 100-watt is triggered over my tired, graying head and that i see things in a whole new light. If it's the president of the United States who activates the light, well, it can make me proud to get an American. Thanks to some philosophy President Bush shared a few days ago, I realized that I have been looking at this whole Iraq thing bass-ackwards. The sorry simple truth is, my whole perspective on such things as current events is fairly gloom-and-doom and entrenchified. I think that is the word. My big epiphany came after bad guys in Iraq bombed police stations plus a Red Cross facility and killed about 40 people. I was very discouraged, then again the president spoke."The more lucrative we are on the ground, the greater these killers will react," the zen President said. "The more progress we make in the grass, the more free the Iraqis become, the harder electricity is available, the greater kids that are going to school, the harder desperate these killers become, because they can't stand the thought of a free society."Ding, ding, ding – needless to say that's right. Do you realize how bad things would really be if there were no suicide bombings, guerrilla attacks and anti-American violence in Iraq? It could be a sure sign the enemies of freedom were kickin' back and having ready for Ramadan since they knew we weren't improving Iraq right. That's scary. If we weren't making such good progress, deficiency of violence and slaughter would a sure hint of problems. The real disaster will come if we found Bottom. Disaster-city, big time. It's great that he's still about the lam because it just shows how impressed the main evil-doer is with our reconstruction of Iraq. If things would the dogs, Saddam would turn himself in, knowing the masses would rescue him and return him to his palaces. Keep this in mind the next time you're stuck in the water cooler which has a gloom-and-doom guy like I became: a free Saddam means freedom in Iraq is becoming entrenchified.We also better hope unfortunately we cannot nab Osama. The minute that guy gets plunked into a dungeon in Gitmo, forget about it. That is to be proof positive that al Qaeda is indeed confident that our war on terror is terrible that they may let us capture their fearless leader being a taunt and a distraction. The truth is the logic here? Only were to bump into Osama at Starbucks today, it would be my duty to purchase him a latte plus a Halloween mask and send him into hiding. Same with Mullah Omar. And those weapons of mass destruction.This sort of geopolitical theory isn't just for foreign stuff. Consider the California wildfires. Sure, they are a short-term inconvenience. But in 12 months everything will be fine although hundreds of thousands acres were scorched a little bit. It just proves that God wants us to drill for oil within the wilds of Alaska since it is just not a big deal. In fact, all this smoke and pollution is simply a reminder that smoke and pollution certainly are a part of nature and all this EPA stuff is simply mumbo-jumbo. Some of the best news lately originated in the folks who do the census. Not merely did they get the official poverty rate rose from 11.7 percent in 2001 to 12.One percent in 2002, they discovered that 2.4 million lots more people didn't have any health insurance. First of all, this does a pretty good job of explaining why poor people are so full of sour grapes. However the statistics show that world war 2 to make rich people richer is making progress. So when poor people realize that the rich are getting richer, they'll realize that America is the land of opportunity.Provided that the economy doesn't warm up, the president will do all right in '04. And bad stuff will be good. Dick Meyer, the Editorial Director of CBSNews.com, relies in Washington. For several years, he was a political and investigative producer for your CBS News Evening News With Dan Rather. E-mail questions, comments, complaints and ideas to Against the GrainBy Dick Meyer mulberry alexa
Accidents of medical aircraft have reached a "disturbing" level, a federal safety official said Monday while he arrived at the scene where two helicopters collided, killing six people."We're very concerned with that," National Transportation Safety Board chairman Mark Rosenker told reporters. "We're gonna work very, very difficult to make sure we understand just what happened here ... and make recommendations to prevent it from happening again."The collision Sunday near Flagstaff Clinic killed both patients, critically injured a nurse, and rained debris near a group. Two emergency workers suffered minor burns within an explosion in the wreckage of one of the aircraft.Lawrence Garduno, who lives with regards to a half mile from your crash, said he heard a loud boom that rattled the windows. He drove toward the hospital and stopped to view the burning wreckage. "It kind of scares me," Garduno said. "If this had happened one half mile closer, it may have fallen on the house."Witnesses said the elements was clear, nor helicopter seemed to have mechanical problems, CBS News reports.There were nine serious accidents with emergency medical aircraft this coming year, six of them involving helicopters, NTSB spokesman Ted Lopatkiewicz said. Sixteen people died in the helicopter accidents, including the six in Sunday's crash, that have the largest death toll. Rosenker referred to as numbers a "disturbing trend."One of the helicopters that crashed Sunday was carrying a patient with a medical emergency from your Grand Canyon, officials said. It turned out operated by Classic Helicopters of Woods Cross, Utah.The other helicopter, operated by Air Methods from Englewood, Colo., was from the nearby community of Winslow, said Capt. Mark Johnson, a spokesman for the Flagstaff Fire Department.The victims from the Classic helicopter were referred to as pilot Tom Caldwell, 54, paramedic Tom Clausing, 36, and also the Grand Canyon patient, Michael McDonald, 26. Flight nurse James Taylor, 36, was at critical condition Monday at Flagstaff Hospital.On the other helicopter, the victims were identified Monday as pilot Pat Graham, 50, flight nurse Shawn Shreeve, 36, and patient Raymond Zest, 54."We've been in business 20 years, and these are the initial fatalities we've experienced," said Matt Stein, an airplane pilot with Classic Helicopters subsidiary Classic Lifeguard Aeromedical Services in Page, Ariz. "They were all heroes. They were out carrying out a great service for their communities."Aaron Todd, chief executive for Air Methods Corp., said Monday that his company's helicopter had been flown by a veteran pilot. Citing the continued investigation, he declined to go over details.Flagstaff Medical Center President Bill Bradel said Monday a healthcare facility was not releasing any precisely the crash, instead centering on family members of those who died."I watched our trauma team work diligently trying to save the lives in the victims of this terrible crash," he was quoted saying.Both aircraft were Bell 407 models, said Ian Gregor, a spokesman with all the Federal Aviation Administration.Stein claimed it was rare for two main medical helicopters to attempt to land at a hospital concurrently. Flagstaff Medical Center doesn't have flight controllers, he explained, and it's up to the pilots to observe each other as they approach.The falling debris embark a brush fire, which spread to 10 acres prior to being contained. The aircraft were so mangled, Johnson said, that "they're not recognizable as helicopters."It was the other major helicopter collision in Arizona in under a year. Last July 27, two news helicopters collided while covering an automobile chase near Phoenix, killing all people on board. Rosenker said NTSB investigators will appear at similarities backward and forward accidents to identify any potential safety gaps.Flagstaff is all about 130 miles north of Phoenix. mulberry oak bayswater
"It just maks it worse. It makes it worse," said Gretchen. mulberry small bayswater satchel
SOURCES: 70th annual meeting in the American College of Rheumatology, Washington, D.C., Nov. 10-15, 2006; Joanne M. Jordan, MD, MPH, associate professor of drugs and orthopaedics, University of New york Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Chapel Hill. Robert L. Wortmann, MD, professor and chairman, department of rheumatology, the University of Oklahoma, Tulsa. Arthritis Foundation web site. By Denise Mann Reviewed by Louise Chang the mulberry
Lawyers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency discouraged officials from pursuing reports of dangerous numbers of formaldehyde in trailers housing a huge number of hurricane victims, according to documents subpoenaed by House members and released Thursday.Lawmakers referred to as the actions sickening and infuriating at a hearing that included dramatic testimony from three trailer occupants whose families suspect formaldehyde is usually to blame for their various illnesses.In May, CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian broke the story of the nearly 86,000 families with rising health conditions still living in FEMA trailers throughout the Gulf.Both Democrats and Republicans bitterly criticized FEMA's decisions to conduct limited inspections or tests of trailers whose occupants reported various respiratory problems. The home Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subpoenaed FEMA records showing that agency lawyers warned officials there could be liability problems if formaldehyde tests suggested negligence on the government's part.The committee's outrage was widespread, backed by internal FEMA emails and memos that only came to light within the last few days. Documents revealed that FEMA officials and attorneys "consistently rejected" repeated necessitates testing from its own field staff because they would "imply FEMA's ownership from the issue," reported Keteyian. "It's sickening and the exact opposite of what government ought to be," said committee chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif. "It is not possible to read the FEMA documents instead of be infuriated."FEMA administrator R. David Paulson apologized on the trailer occupants."This agency made the most effective decisions it could using the information it had," Paulson testified. "Now we all know we have to do something different than we've done in days gone by."CBS News has learned that health issues in FEMA trailers could reach well past serious respiratory problems; several deaths may related to toxic levels of formaldehyde gas, reports Keteyian.Earl Shorty, a resident of Louisiana, moved into a FEMA travel trailer a single compound with his wife, Desiree, in regards to a year ago. "Within four months as we moved in here, she just started coughing and she would get weak," Shorty told Keteyian. Earl says his wife didn't smoke knowning that every time she left a clip the coughing would stop. Eventually, she became too weak to travel out. On July 2, she took her last breath in a local hospital. "She was only looking at me and she said, 'Babe, I'm scared,'" said Shorty. "That's the final thing I remember her telling me, that she was scared." Formaldehyde, sometimes present in building materials used in manufactured homes, can cause respiratory problems and possibly cancer in high doses. FEMA provided greater than 120,000 trailers to victims from the 2005 hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and lots of thousands of people still occupy them, specifically in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas.Formaldehyde can be used in a number of materials from the trailers, including the particleboard used to make walls and cabinets.When complaints of possible formaldehyde poisoning surfaced at the begining of 2006, FEMA officials tested one occupied trailer and announced "there isn't any ongoing risk" for trailer users. But documents show the amount of formaldehyde found were higher than those considered safe by several government health insurance and environment agencies.The committee unearthed documents through which one FEMA lawyer advised: "Do not initiate any testing until we supply the OK. ... Once you get results ... the time is running on our duty to respond to them."When they finally, being forced, tested some trailers for formaldehyde levels, they instructed owners to keep all windows and doors open and keep air conditioners running around the clock for several days before the tests — which still became available high, reports Fuss.Formaldehyde can be a carcinogen, and the fumes can get to the eyes, nose, throat and skin. FEMA Trailers And Formaldehyde Residents Getting Sick? Documents Found Fumes Felt In Indiana Lindsay Huckabee of Kiln, Miss., said she, her five children and her husband all have experienced symptoms of formaldehyde exposure. "I began to having migraine headaches and pre-term labor," Huckabee told the panel. "My daughter, who has been asthma-free for about a year, began having asthma attacks. Three of the children began having nosebleeds several times a week." no previous page next 1/2 cheap mulberry bag
By CBSNews.com Senior Political Editor Vaughn Ververs. After weeks of anticipation, the Senate showdown in Iraq stalled Monday over procedural disagreement, leaving open the chance that this public debate over President Bush's want to send more than 21,000 additional troops to Iraq will not likely take place. But increasing pressure inside all parties make it likely that the Senate will take inside the matter in one form or another. The Bush administration wish to avoid a vote that would result in the passage of anything opposing the protection, even if it is just a non-binding resolution. In recent weeks, obama has seen support for his troop surge plan slip among Republican senators, including key members like John Warner of Virginia, a co-sponsor of 1 of the resolutions. A repudiation from the surge would damage the administration's standing and function a vote of no confidence within the policy. But several Republican Senators by having an eye on re-election in 2008 risk a fate like the one many within their party suffered recently if they are seen as too supportive in the president's policy. Vulnerable GOP Senators up next year include Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Susan Collins of Maine, both whom crossed party lines and voted with Democrats to maneuver the resolution forward. Republicans are requesting a debate and vote on four separate resolutions, by using varying levels of support or opposition towards the troop surge. Giving lawmakers a choice of options to vote on helps keep any single one from obtaining the 60 votes necessary to pass and allow the administration to dodge a public rebuke —or otherwise increase the chances of passing something less critical from the policy. Senate Democrats want just gadget versions — a bipartisan resolution expressing opposition for the surge and another which requires a series of benchmarks but doesn't oppose a troop increase. Still, it's not entirely clear how passage of any non-binding resolution would be received by the American public. President Bush's troop surge was opposed by two-thirds of voters in a CBS News poll conducted a few weeks ago. But Americans were evenly split over their support to get a non-binding resolution by Congress, with 42 percent supporting it and 42 percent opposing. Wide majorities want Congress to oppose President Bush's Iraq policies in substantial ways. In accordance with the CBS News poll, 72 percent said the president should get congressional authorization before sending more troops to Iraq, and 69 percent said Congress should block funding for your surge. But with a razor-thin majority in the Senate, and 60 votes needed to accomplish almost anything, the reality is that a non-binding resolution is around as far as Democrats may go right now.It's a reality Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton acknowledged in their speech to Democratic Party activists last week. Speaking over a handful of protestors calling for an end towards the war, Clinton said, "There a wide range of people who wish we will do more. But i want to say that if we can get a large, bipartisan vote to disapprove this president's insurance policy for escalation, that will be the first time that we'll have said no to President Bush and began to reverse his policies." Senate Democrats "have to possess 60 votes to cap troops, to limit funding," she added.Other Democratic presidential candidates consider a tougher line around the war, looking to take advantage of the strong anti-war sentiment within their party. Speaking to precisely the same audience as Clinton, former vice presidential nominee John Edwards said, "We is not satisfied with passing non-binding resolutions that we understand this president will ignore."Some, like former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, required an immediate end to the war. But that will mean stopping funding to the war altogether — something which is practically impossible in the present environment and a direction that could leave the party available to the charge that it does not support the troops.It's from the interest for a growing number of members in both parties, then, to be on the record opposing the president's troop surge. Some Republicans require it to demonstrate independence about the war for next year's elections, while Democrats demand it to capitalize on public sentiment up against the surge and deliver for their party activists.By Vaughn Ververs mulberry messenger bags
http://www.simplecalorie.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=178225
http://02a25cc.netsolhost.com/CatholicTalk/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=80826
http://www.phipsi.com/forum/index.php?/user/6983-zuiaioiusonn/
[url=http://www.goodbootshome.co.uk/fine-ugg-bailey-button-chestnut-p-367.html]ugg bailey button chestnut[/url]
|
| |
| |
