| zuiaipiugoik | Date: Wednesday, 27 Nov 2013, 3:09 PM | Message # 1 |
|
Lieutenant
Group: Users
Messages: 48
Status: Offline
| Former President Bill Clinton again overshadowed his presidential candidate-wife with remarks about the campaign trail which, as an alternative to clear the air over Hillary Clinton's statements on Bosnia, only did actually muddy the waters.In Indiana Thursday, President Clinton said Sen. Clinton has "misstated" instances of her arrival in Bosnia under sniper fire - a comment that was quickly refuted by a CBS News video of her 1996 trip - but suggested that the brouhaha over her remarks (by the press and her opponents) was exaggerated. "You might have thought, you know, that she'd robbed a bank how they carried on about this." Nevertheless the former president's defense of his wife - that she had made the comment late into the evening after long hours of campaigning - was itself refuted by CBS News correspondent Jim Axelrod, who showed the brand new York Senator making her remarks early one morning after having a day of rest. The question being asked is, with Hillary's Bosnia comments having long died down (the Senator has even joked about it more than once), why would the former president raise the matter again, to make inaccurate points in doing so? "You can hear both Republicans and Democrats say about President Clinton, that is said so many times before, 'He just cannot help himself,'" Politico columnist Mike Allen told Early Show anchor Debbye Turner. Allen likened the feeling within the Clinton campaign towards the famous "Saturday Night Live" skit in the 1988 presidential race, "where Michael Dukakis said about George Bush's father, 'I can't believe I'm losing to this particular guy.' "I believe that this reflects extreme frustration in the Clinton family, inside the Clinton campaign, concerning the trajectory of this race." "When you are supporting someone you love, you absolutely do take it very much to heart," Sen. Clinton said within a recent appearance on "The Tonight Show." "I've told him, 'Okay, honey, that's fine. We don't have to get excited about it.' So he's doing a great job for me, but he does get a little overly enthusiastic sometimes." Allen said it sounded as if Hillary is distancing herself from Bill. "It looks like she's saying, 'Honey, cool it, shut up, take it easy.' These comments have just raised issues that hurt her, like his earlier remarks that hurt her with black voters. And he and Chelsea Clinton are out very hard campaigning hard for her, however keeps coming up. "Some even ponder whether there's a perverse psychology where he's attempting to undermine her campaign. I can't think that's right, because her election is needed his legacy, cause him to a much bigger historic figure. Speculate your correspondents can tell you, he's been pulled in the past from the press. There's not cameras on rope lines anymore. They try to keep him quiet. "But he is out and boom, carries a whole different story compared to what the campaign wanted." 12 months and a half ago, with Hillary Clinton considered the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, Bill Clinton was viewed as her campaign's strongest weapon. And now? "People talked about the mixed blessing of Bill Clinton," Allen said. "He had always appeared as if an unalloyed asset. He reminded Democrats, many Americans of the better time, <and>is] one of the best political strategists who has ever lived in America. But instead he's just turned into a distraction. So yes, indeed, you will notice less of him. "He's a real contrast to Chelsea Clinton, their daughter, who has done more than 100 question-and-answers at colleges, many of them on camera, with out one flub." grey knitted ugg boots
Nearly everyone has an opinion about Friday night's presidential debate in Mississippi … and that includes our senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield: So, have you watch the debates?Yes, I said "debates." There are two, actually: One, a clear, crisp, crisp exchange on problems with foreign policy and national security ... and a debate on the economy which in fact had almost nothing to do with reality.The differences on matters international were clear. John McCain said if we'd follow Obama's opposition for the surge, we'd have gone Iraq in defeat. "If we snatch defeat through the jaws of victory and adopt Senator Obama's plan, you have to will have a wider war and this will make things more difficult throughout the region, including in Afghanistan," he said. Obama said that on the big question - to attend war - he got it right."You said it was going to be quick and straightforward; you said we knew the location where the weapons of mass destruction were - you had been wrong," Obama thought to McCain. "You said that we were likely to be greeted as liberators - you're wrong."This debate what food was in a pretty high level because the candidates were confident with the terrain.But around the first debate - you understand, the one that took place within the shadow of the grimmest overall economy since the Depression - what did we have?From Senator McCain, we got a spat, larded with Senate-speak (cost-plus contracts? Continuing resolutions?) and indictments of penny-ante spending that originated in McCain's Greatest Hits. "We spent $3 million to review the DNA of bears in Montana. I am not sure if that was a criminal issue or perhaps a paternal," he said. And from Senator Obama, we got a resolute determination not to include moderator Jim Lehrer's plea to see us something - anything - among Obama's promises which may have to be put aside due to the potential for financial Armageddon.So what's really going on here? Put simply, might know about are facing simply demands too much from these candidates in the form of candor. Remember what happened to Walter Mondale when he said he'd raise our taxes? Reagan won inside a landslide. Now imagine what a candidate who had previously been trying to level together with the voters might decide to say: Our overall health care costs are rising so quick that we might have to make a list of a tough question: how is it that everyone over 65, including folks with seven-figure incomes, get federally-funded medical care? Or how about: Inside your free ourselves from the energy dependence, so costly so dangerous, is to push the cost of gasoline higher - to produce alternatives to fossil fuel along with the internal combustion engine attractive. … or we can no longer assume that we will enjoy the levels of comfort and abundance we have assumed was our birthright for longer than half a century.There have been instances when leaders have talked to the people in such terms: Winston Churchill began one among his famous wartime speeches having a withering account of defeats about the battlefield. He assumed that only after he had spoken so bluntly would his promise of victory be credible.Today, Churchill would have been told, "The focus groups dislike bad news."Of course, if he'd listened, individuals in London might be speaking German today. black cardy ugg boots
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said within an interview Wednesday that Iran’s reaction to an international demand for a freeze within the regime's nuclear activity “is not an really serious answer” - and said new economic sanctions will probably result.“Iran has a way out if they ever wish, but we're going to seriously pursue sanctions should they don’t,” Rice told Politico and Yahoo! News. “You will need to hope that there are reasonable folks Iran who see this as not the best way to run a country.”In their own first public comments since a gathering call between six world powers on Wednesday to find out their next step on Iran, the secretary maintained that the U.S. doesn't view Iran as “an enduring enemy” and has “been pretty tough using them already” by backing three multiple United Nations sanctions.U.S. officials said Iran’s response, delivered Tuesday for the six-nation group, to a new package of incentives to avoid its enrichment and reprocessing of uranium was disappointing and insufficient. The package had wanted to drop current sanctions if Iran froze its nuclear program.“They ought to have felt like time is running out quite a long time ago,” she said in the elegant reception room near her private suite. “If you are having trouble getting banks in the future in, getting investment, when export credits are going down from around the world, when you have inflation roaring, time is running out.”The six-nation group – 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany - contends that Iran is building nuclear warheads within the guise of a civilian power program. Rice said the dictatorship should “make a tough decision” to stop a further financial squeeze from your Security Council, which she believes is likely to act this fall.“Precisely what is happening to Iran is its isolation is costing them,” she said. “It’s owning an effect. I think that’s one good reason that you’re seeing them attempting to give half-answers rather than simply saying no thanks. But the fact is we won’t accept half-answers, either.”Rice said there was consensus among Washington’s diplomatic allies on how to respond to the latest talking points from Iran. “They agreed the Iranian answer is not adequate, that it is not a really serious answer,” she said. “So we’re now going to begin to consult regarding how to get back on the second track, which would be to move again toward … a burglar Council resolution.”Russia's envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, said his government hadn't decided to impose further sanctions and wished for a resolution through further talks.Rice said the Bush administration still believes “that the diplomatic option can work and that there is time for it to work.” She said section of her optimism is a result of “elites” in Iran “who don’t need to see this kind of isolation due to business interests or other” reasons.“I believe there is a lot of ferment in Iran at this time,” she said. “During their newspapers, as controlled as they are, <there>is] a lot of questioning of the policies of President <Mahmoud> Ahmadinejad. All things considered, inflation is running wild in Iran. It’s a rustic that’s experiencing, of the things, brownouts in a country which has as much energy since it does.” vintage mulberry bags
Police in riot gear arrested two women inside their 70s and seven others involved in an antiwar march at the Republican National Convention on Sunday when they crossed a security fence right into a restricted area near Xcel Energy Center.The nine were arrested for trespassing, said Doug Holtz, a St. Paul police commander. Basically one, who was without identification, were released by police shortly after their arrest.Eight with the protesters were handcuffed, and a few flashed the peace sign to onlookers and media gathered in the security fence. Betty McKenzie, a 78-year-old nun, had not been handcuffed as she was led away. The protesters had planned ahead of time to cross the fence, and organizers had announced it in front of the march, which drew about 250 people."We will march into the arms of police. Anything they are going to do is all right along with us," organizer David Harris said to the marchers before they entered the restricted zone. He was among those arrested."I believe you need to stop this war," said Steve Clemens, 57, of Minneapolis, who also crossed a fence.The arrests capped a normally peaceful march organized by Veterans for Peace and fellow peace group CodePink that began in the Capitol and made its method to the convention hall. It absolutely was a quiet warm-up before a planned march Monday that's expected to attract a bigger crowd; organizers of Monday's march have said they wish to have as many as 50,000 people.Jeanne Hynes, 72, of St. Paul was arrested with your ex friend McKenzie, a nun from your Sisters of St. Joseph."We both planned to achieve this if we could make it to this point," said Hynes as she waited to get arrested at the end of the half-mile route. "We weren't certain that our backs would endure."As the march began, Harris browse the names of soldiers and civilians killed in Iraq. After each name was read, the marchers near Harris shouted "We will remember you!"Bringing in the rear of the march, around three dozen people wearing orange jump suits and black hoods over their heads marched alone with their hands behind their backs. Marchers carried banners that said, "Torture Destroys Us All." Sixty-one combat boots were aligned on the Capitol lawn to represent Minnesota soldiers who died in Iraq."We intend to make it very clear we're pro-soldier and anti-war," said Madea Benjamin, co-founder of CodePink.Korean War veteran Bill Starr, 73, was carrying a united states flag and a tombstone with all the name of a soldier killed in Iraq. He was quoted saying he sees futility in war."I can freeze my house and scream over it or I can come here," said Starr, of Minneapolis, who marched together with his 37-year-old daughter.Meanwhile, people in the RNC Welcoming Committee - is not a sponsor from the Monday march but may be helping other protest groups coordinate - were looking to regroup after a series of raids Friday night and Saturday saw six people arrested and materials seized.Assistant St. Paul Police Chief Matt Bostrom said those arrested had plans to disrupt transportation in the region, damage property and injure others.Several of what was seized included knives, axes, bomb-making materials and anti-war literature.It did not appear likely that runners arrested would be out of jail in time to aid organize protesters or engage in Monday's event. They aren't necessary to be brought before a judge until noon on Wednesday, said their attorney Bruce Nestor.Even so, Nestor said he was hopeful which a judge would look at the cases against the six on Sunday and they also could be released sooner. He said none of the six possess convictions other than misdemeanors and none have a very history of violence.The arrested can legally take place for 36 hours, excluding the weekend or even the Labor Day holiday."It's pretty clear that the point is to get organizers out of the picture," said Andy Fahlstrom, spokesman to the RNC Welcoming Committee. He was quoted saying those arrested were in control of various things, including finding housing for protesters and arranging food, as well as the arrests had adversely affected their organization.Meanwhile, the organizers of Monday's march said they weren't changing their plans despite the GOP's decision to sharply curtail that day's session."The main effect of the scaling-back of the convention tomorrow is that our voices will be front and center and it will are the main news that is certainly happening tomorrow," said Jess Sundin, in the Coalition to March around the RNC and Stop the War."The world will see people of this country avoid the war in Iraq." mulberry sale shop
Taliban militants have set free the final group of South Koreans abducted by the extremist organization in central Afghanistan, witnesses said. The two women and one man were covered in dust while they walked out of the desert, accompanied by three armed men, and were turned over to waiting officials with the International Committee of the Red Cross, a connected Press reporter at the scene said. Their freedom ended a six-week drama that began every time a 23-member group of Christian church volunteers was abducted on the busy road in the central Ghazni province on July 19. Two captives were executed by the kidnappers.The last seven captives were released Thursday by 50 % separate groups. Two men as well as women were handed over to the officials of the International Committee with the Red Cross with a road in Janda area in central Afghanistan earlier in the day.The senior Taliban commander in Afghanistan's Ghazni province told CBS news earlier Thursday that all the South Koreans could be freed before the day's end.Among the hostages, a man who identified himself as Mr. Che, told CBS News by telephone Thursday morning that "we are all well, and pass on my message to my children that I will be free soon, and definately will meet them soon."Asked if he and the other captives had been treated well by the fundamentalist Islamic group, Che said, "when we have Seoul, we will talk with that topic."South Korean presidential spokesman Cheon Ho-sun said Thursday once free, the group would check out Kabul before returning home via Dubai.On Wednesday, the Taliban released 12 of 19 South Koreans held hostage, included in a deal with Seoul that particular Afghan minister warned would embolden the insurgents.The hostages were released in the care of officials with the International Committee with the Red Cross at three separate locations in central Afghanistan.In late July, the militants killed two male hostages, and they released two women recently as gesture of goodwill.Underneath the terms of Tuesday's deal, South Korea reaffirmed a pledge it made prior to the hostage crisis began to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan by eliminate this year. Seoul also said it would prevent South Korean Christian missionaries from employed in the staunchly Muslim country, something it had already promised to perform.The Taliban apparently backed upon earlier demands for any prisoner exchange. But the militant group, which killed two South Korean hostages a few weeks ago, could emerge with enhanced political legitimacy for negotiating successfully using a foreign government.Nasir told CBS News Thursday how the Taliban was "satisfied with the deal," but added that most Westerns must leave Afghanistan, or risk being kidnapped and killed.Another Taliban commander told CBS earlier this week that kidnapping had been considered, "a good strategy".Columbia and the Taliban have said nothing changed hands as part of the deal.An Indonesian government official who taken part in the negotiations Tuesday between three South Korean officials and a couple Taliban commanders where the deal was struck said money was not brought up."From what I saw and from some tips i heard in the talks, it wasn't an issue," Heru Wicaksono told The Associated Press.Wicaksono, a high-ranking official with the Indonesian Embassy in Kabul, said the Taliban were motivated by "humanitarian feelings" to free the captives.The Afghan government was not party to the negotiations, which happened in Ghazni and were facilitated by the ICRC.Wicaksono was an observer in the talks, chosen by each party because Indonesia is really a large Muslim country.South Korea's government, that is under intense domestic pressure to bring the hostages home safely, said hello had tried to comply with international principles while putting priority on saving the captives.But Afghan Commerce Minister Amin Farhang criticized the deal."One has to say that this release under these conditions can make our difficulties in Afghanistan even larger," he told Germany's Bayerischer Rundfunk radio. "We fear this decision could become a precedent. The Taliban will keep trying to take hostages to achieve their aims in Afghanistan."A German engineer and four Afghan colleagues kidnapped a day prior to South Koreans are still being held.Afghanistan has seen a rash of kidnappings of foreigners throughout the last year.The Italian and Afghan governments were heavily criticized in March for receiving free five Taliban prisoners to win the production of an Italian journalist. The head of the Italian aid agency Emergency also has said Rome also paid a $2 million ransom recently for a kidnapped Italian photographer - a claim Italian officials did not deny. black cardy uggs
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks were mixed on Friday, after news of falling consumer sentiment in April counterbalance the boost from tamer March core producer prices along with upbeat earnings and forecasts from blue chips Merck & Co Inc, General Electric Co. and McDonald's Corp.Technology shares turned negative after news of an product delay at Apple Inc.The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 24 points at 12,577, just 14 of its 30 components in positive territory. "The market's advance is solely momentum driven," said Paul Mendelsohn, chief investment strategist at Windham Financial Services."It's too soon to get a good idea about earnings. But earnings expectations so low already, it should not be so hard to overpower them."Merck almost single-handedly lifted the Dow. Its shares were up 8.2% after it lifted its profit forecast for that year, citing "strong performance" across its products and sparking a Goldman Sachs upgrade with the stock.Merck also received a supplementary lift after confirming which a Federal court has dismissed a securities class action lawsuit agains the company about its former arthritis treatment Vioxx.Meanwhile, shares of Alcoa Inc. , Intel Corp. , Microsoft Corp. and IBM weighed about the Dow.In spite of overall gloomy expectations for the first-quarter earnings season, several blue chips besides Merck created upbeat news on Friday.Kenmore Co. rose 0.6% after the bellwether's first-quarter results came in line with analysts expectations. GE also reaffirmed its earnings guidance for 2007.McDonald's Corp. gained 1.2%. The business said worldwide same-store sales rose 8.2% and stated it expects first-quarter earnings of 62 cents, including a 1-cent gain from foreign currency translation. Analysts polled by Thomson Financial typically expect first-quarter earnings of 57 cents per share. Analysts' estimates usually exclude items.The S&P 500 index rose 1.8 points to 1,449, while the Nasdaq Composite eased 0.6 suggests 2,479.Trading volumes showed 628 million shares exchanging practical the New York Stock trading game and 792 million trading about the Nasdaq. Declining issues outpaced gainers by 8 to 7 for the NYSE and by 14 to 13 for the Nasdaq.By sector, pharmaceutical , oil and gold led the gains, while semiconductors , software and computer technology fell.Tech shares were overwhelmed by Apple Inc. , whose shares fell 1.4% after saying it will delay the release of Leopard, the next upgrade of its Mac os, until October.Elsewhere, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. said the Justice Department has requested more information on their planned merger. But the two companies' stock received a lift from CBS Corp.'s announcement that it has canceled Don Imus' show from the wake of the talk show host's racially-charged remarks regarding the Rutgers University women's basketball team.Proof in the consumer puddingStock proxies first turned lower after news the Reuters/University of Michigan consumer sentiment index fell to 85.3 in April from 88.4 in March, reaching its lowest level since August of 2006. Economists expected the index to fall to 87.0. Consumers cited higher gasoline prices and continued decliners inside the housing market.The expectations index, which is a component of the index of leading economic indicators, fell to 74.3 in April from 78.7 in March.With gasoline prices more likely to rise further ahead of the summer driving season, the expectations index could even dip further, said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics."We may not be surprised if it would slip below the 68.0 recorded when gas prices peaked last summer," he explained, in a note. "But even at its current level the expectations number is 9.6 points underneath the reading from March 2001, the firsmonth in the <last> recession." Earlier news that producer prices, excluding food and energy, were unchanged in March, had boosted hopes that inflation could be under control and that the government Reserve has enough leg room to chop interest rates to boost the economy, if required.But "Federal Reserve policymakers face a hard challenge accomplishing both moderate inflation and growth," said Peter Morici, economics professor using the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, inside a note."Confronting a Hobson collection of pushing the economy into recession or leaving an inflation spiral, the top policy course may be to do no harm, leave the economy towards the natural dynamics," he stated.Other marketsBonds were slightly higher following the PPI and the decline in consumer sentiment. The benchmark 10-year Treasury bond was up 1/32 at 99 4/32, yielding 4.761%. The dollar weakened against both the euro and the yen as traders adjusted their positions in front of a Group of Seven meeting. Oil, meanwhile, fell slightly, giving back several of Thursday's sharp gains around the back of an International Energy Agency report that world oil output fell in March. The May-dated light crude contract was down 1 cent at $63.84 a barrel.Among oil majors, Exxon Mobil Corp. still rose slightly.By Nick Godt mulberry nursery
Actor Dennis Quaid told Congress on Wednesday of your harrowing, near-fatal drug mix-up in which his newborn twins were administered 1,000 times the traditional dose of a blood thinner.The actor said his family's brush with tragedy underscores the necessity to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable through lawsuits, a remedy that is becoming increasingly problematic for injured consumers.Some 7,000 Americans die each year from medication errors.At issue prior to House Reform and Government Oversight Committee is a move by regulators with the Food and Drug Administration to get yourself into lawsuits on the side of defendant drug companies.In the court, the drug companies argue that federal regulation should pre-empt the filing of lawsuits under state guiidelines, a matter that will come prior to Supreme Court later in 2010 in a case from Vermont.The Quaid folks are suing drug maker Baxter Healthcare Corp., which is seeking dismissal from the lawsuit on federal pre-emption grounds how the FDA approved the labeling."Like many Americans, I assumed that a big problem inside our country was frivolous lawsuits," Quaid testified. "But now we all know that the courts tend to be the only path to justice."Quaid declared that if all lawsuits are pre-empted, "it will basically make us uninformed and uncompensated lab rats."The committee's ranking Republican, Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, sympathized with Quaid, stating that if this had happened to the Davis family, "I'd be suing everybody on the horizon." Apart from Quaid's case, Davis required balance between total pre-emption and unrestrained litigation.Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., asserted if manufacturers face no liability, all of the financial incentives will point them in the wrong direction knowning that abusive practices will multiply.Quaid told the committee his family's life-altering story began in November 2007 when twins Thomas and Zoe, during the time 12 days old, created a staph infection and had to be hospitalized.The children were mistakenly administered the wrong version of the drug heparin, as a result of two concentrations from the drug being bottled with the exact same labels and size. When rotated slightly since they often are when stored, the lighting blue 10-unit bottle and the 10,000-unit dark blue bottle are virtually indistinguishable, Quaid told the panel."It was the scariest, most terrifying day that I think either individuals have ever been through, ahead face to face with your children who - so young because kinda situation," Quaid told "60 Minutes" correspondent Steve Kroft within a March interview.The actor asked whether consumers' rights to file a lawsuit under state law needs to be blocked just because the FDA approves the drug and its particular labeling and packaging.The actor said that under the approach favored by business and the federal government, the FDA handed the drug maker "a get-out-of-jail-free card" when the regulatory agency allowed heparin onto the market.The Quaids' children recovered, though "we do not know what the longer-term effects will probably be," said Quaid.But Calif. Congressman Brian Bilbray told Quaid there's another side on the argument - that suing drug companies also can lead to tragedy, reports CBS News correspondent Chip Reid.2 decades ago Bilbray's pregnant wife needed a medicine that had been taken off industry because of a lawsuit."I will go to my grave believing that my child is dead as they was denied the merchandise that he desperately needed as part of his first trimester," Bilbray said.It isn't just Congress that's wrestling with the question of when consumers can sue drug companies, reports Reid. Later this season, the issue will go prior to Supreme Court. mulberry clipper bag
The Supreme Court tightened limits on student speech Monday, ruling against a high school student and his awesome 14-foot-long "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner.Schools may prohibit student expression that can be interpreted as advocating drug use, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for your court in a 5-4 ruling.Joseph Frederick unfurled his homemade sign on a winter morning in 2002, because Olympic torch made its way through Juneau, Alaska, on the way to the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.Frederick said the banner was obviously a nonsensical message he first saw with a snowboard. He intended the banner to proclaim his directly to say anything at all.His principal, Deborah Morse, said the words was a pro-drug message which had no place at a school-sanctioned event. Frederick denied he was advocating for substance abuse."The message on Frederick's banner is cryptic," Roberts said. "But Principal Morse thought the banner will be interpreted by those viewing it as promoting illegal drug use, and that interpretation is plainly an acceptable one."CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen said he had not been surprised by the ruling, praoclaiming that, "high school students most often have been blocked from getting the same first amendment rights as adults which ruling falls right into a long line of cases that let them know. The lesson here's if you want to exercise your full free expression rights get as far from your high school as you can."Morse suspended the student, prompting a federal civil rights lawsuit.Students in public areas schools don't have the same rights as adults, but neither would they leave their constitutional protections with the schoolhouse gate, as the court said in a landmark speech-rights ruling from Vietnam era.The court has limited what students are capable of doing in subsequent cases, saying they could not be disruptive or lewd or restrict a school's basic educational mission.Frederick, now 23, said he later were required to drop out of college after his father lost his job. The elder Frederick, who worked for the company that insures the Juneau schools, was fired in association with his son's legal fight, the son said. A jury recently awarded Frank Frederick $200,000 in a lawsuit he filed over his firing.Joseph Frederick pleaded guilty in 2004 with a misdemeanor charge of selling marijuana at Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, according to court records.Also on Monday, legal court loosened restrictions on corporate- and union funded television ads that air all-around elections, weakening a key provision of your landmark campaign finance law. The court, split 5-4, in upholding an appeals court ruling make fish an anti-abortion group should have been in a position to air ads through the final two months ahead of the 2004 elections."This is a defeat for the McCain-Feingold legislation," Cohen said, adding that this ruling is "a come back to the old ways, when there are fewer restrictions on how people spend money in terms of campaigns." The final Court's swing vote, Anthony Kennedy, has swung mostly conservative, reports CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews. Overall, legal court under Chief Justice John Roberts has become pro-business, anti-lawsuit and anti-abortion. Other cases the Supreme Court decided Monday: The Top court ruled taxpayers cannot challenge a White House initiative that assists religious charities get yourself a share of federal money. The 5-4 decision blocks a legal case by a group of atheists and agnostics against eight Bush administration officials including the head of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives."This is another case where this court has chipped away at the wall separating church assuring, blocking a lawsuit that challenges a government initiative that assists religion. This is section of a larger trend that tweaks the Establishment Clause in such a way to promote religion," Cohen said. The final Court sided with developers as well as the Bush administration Monday in the dispute with environmentalists over protecting endangered species. Legal court ruled 5-4 for home builders along with the Environmental Protection Agency in a case that involved the intersection of two environmental laws, the Water that is clean Act and the Endangered Species Act. ugg classic mini
http://www.u1314163.fsdata.se/ForumMoraCK/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=47465&p=367166#p367166
http://exile.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=392&p=465#p465
http://twqk.com/BB/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1673
[url=http://www.goodbootshome.co.uk/fine-ugg-bailey-button-chestnut-p-367.html]ugg bailey button chestnut[/url]
|
| |
|
|
