| zuiaipiugoik | Date: Tuesday, 03 Dec 2013, 4:44 AM | Message # 1 |
|
Lieutenant
Group: Users
Messages: 48
Status: Offline
| The top of the Oklahoma ursing Home Association says there is absolutely no crisis. "As far as nursing facilities go, the public has already established almost the perception that may be widespread or ongoing and I can assure you it's not," says Kelly Hardin. ugg boots on clearance
Heath Ledger's family rejected any suggestion Wednesday that the actor killed himself and joined fellow Australians in mourning among their rising stars after he is discovered dead in a Nyc apartment.The Australian-born actor was found face-down and naked on the foot of a bed in the Manhattan apartment Tuesday. Police said there are prescription sleeping pills near Ledger's body, but there wasn't any obvious sign he had committed suicide.Ledger's family members faced a throng of journalists inside the actor's hometown of Perth in wa and read a statement saying his death was purely accidental, though they did not say whether he died of the overdose."We, Heath's family, will tell you the very tragic, untimely and accidental passing of our own dearly loved son, brother and doting father of Matilda," Ledger's father Kim told reporters. "He is discovered peacefully asleep in his New York apartment by his housekeeper at 3:30 p.m. U.S. time." Photos: Heath Ledger Photos: Ledger On Film Kim Ledger remembered his 28-year-old son as being a "down to earth, generous, kindhearted, life-loving, unselfish individual" who had been "extremely inspirational" to those who knew him."Heath has touched so many people on so many different levels during his short life but few had the pleasure of truly knowing him," Kim Ledger said. "Please now respect our family's should grieve and come to terms with this loss privately."Meanwhile, tributes from fellow Australians flooded in Wednesday, with actress Nicole Kidman called Ledger's death a "terrible tragedy."Cate Blanchett, who starred with Ledger inside the Bob Dylan bio-flick "I'm Not There," a role that earned her an Oscar nomination Tuesday for the best supporting actress, said she was "shocked and saddened" at the news."I deeply respect Heath's work and constantly admired his continuing development just as one artist," Blanchett said in a statement published by News Ltd. newspapers online. "My system is with his family and close friends."Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd expressed shock over losing "one individuals nation's finest actors in the prime of his life."Arts and Environment Minister Peter Garrett, former lead singer in the rock band Midnight Oil, referred to it as "a terribly sad day" for Australia."This bloke was a great actor, a new talent and he had much more to give," Garrett told reporters in Canberra. "So it is a shock that he's gone and a moment of sadness, I think, which will last for us nationwide and also for the film community too."Ledger received an Oscar nomination for his role being a troubled gay cowboy inside the 2006 film, "Brokeback Mountain," where he met Michelle Williams, who played his wife inside the film. The two a daughter, now 2-year-old Matilda, and lived together in Ny until they split up last year.Williams' father, Larry, a prominent stock trader currently nationwide fighting extradition to the United States on tax evasion charges, remembered Ledger as "a great talent.""My heart fades to everyone in his family and our kids," Williams told Sydney's The Daily Telegraph.Neil Armfield, who directed Ledger in the last Australian film, "Candy," said the actor had "handled his career incredibly well," steering himself toward more difficult roles."He made a decision about 4 years ago to stop being led by producers and managers and to forge his own way," Armfield told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. "He started utilizing the most interesting directors. He am successful at breaking from the teen idol image." ebay mulberry bag
The woman accused of slashing a little daughter mother's throat and kidnapping her baby convulsed in sobs during her arraignment Thursday.Shannon Torrez, 36, whispered innocent to all four counts — kidnapping, first-degree assault and 2 counts of armed criminal action — during her appearance in Franklin County Associate Circuit Court.Police say Torrez abducted 7-day-old Abigale Lynn Woods on Sept. 15 after slashing the throat in the infant's mother, 21-year-old Stephenie Ochsenbine, then attemptedto pass the newborn off as hers for five days before her sister-in-law became suspicious. The child, known as Abby, was returned to her parents Tuesday, within 24 hours Torrez was arrested.Wearing handcuffs as well as an orange jail-issued jumpsuit, Torrez's legs shook as she stood before Judge David Hoven. She cried and spoke only in hushed tones, whispering "yes" when asked if she understood the costs. At one point, she leaned time for a deputy and said, "Could you will get me a tissue?"Hoven denied a request by Torrez's attorney, Daniel Briegel, to scale back her $1 million bond. She remains inside the Franklin County Jail.Prosecutor Robert Parks said Torrez could face life in prison if convicted.Shop dead Torrez told them that after the birth to a stillborn child Friday morning, she drove by Ochsenbine's home a couple of miles away on Missouri 47 and saw the "Welcome Home Abby" sign that stood within the yard.Investigators wonder the way a woman could deliver a baby, deal with its apparent death, and then recover enough to mastermind a kidnapping all on the same day, reports CBS News correspondent Lee Cowan Looking of her home has turned up no sign of a stillborn or perhaps a miscarriage.Franklin County Sheriff Gary Toelke said investigators continue seeking evidence that would support Torrez's tale.Torrez had told neighbors and family she marry last New Year's Eve and was expecting, reports John Mills of CBS affiliate KMOV St. Louis. Neighbors say she gave the impression to gain weight, but police say they are trying to determine whether she was ever pregnant.You will find there's solid profile of girls who steal other women's babies, say experts."These are women of child-bearing age, they tend to be married or at least living with someone, each of them claim that they have miscarried or a stillbirth or can't have children plus they tend to abduct close to home in their communities or near by," Ernie Allen in the National Center of Abducted and Exploited Children said on CBS News' Earlier Show ."In the vast majority of the events we have seen, they have not" miscarried, Allen added.Torrez reportedly stopped at the home, asked to make use of the phone, then attacked Ochsenbine having a knife and using the baby.A frantic five-day search ensued, drawing international awareness of the rural area 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. But afternoon, the baby was returned and Torrez arrested Tuesday following the suspect's sister-in-law, Dorothy Torrez, contacted authorities.Shannon Torrez, who also went by Shannon Beck, informed her sister-in-law on Sunday that they had given birth on Friday, FBI agent Roland Corvington said. Visiting Shannon Torrez the very next day, Dorothy Torrez persuaded her sister-in-law to look at baby to see a doctor, and on Tuesday both the women went to St. Louis with the doctor's visit.Dorothy Torrez became suspicious tomorrow when she noticed makeup about the forehead of the baby. While using baby's cap, she rubbed from the makeup and found a strawberry-red birthmark that matched the outline provided by investigators have been seeking an abducted baby.After confronting her sister-in-law, Dorothy Torrez contacted police, and hours later a healthy 11-day-old Abigale Lynn Woods was reunited along with her parents. Shannon Torrez was captured.Shannon Torrez lives just a few miles from Ochsenbine's home near Lonedell, Corvington said. She worked as being a nail technician for a year-and-a half in St. Charles prior to being fired in 2005 for unprofessional behavior and never having a license, based on Vel Green, director of Spa Winghaven. mulberry bayswater tote
More than a year after shocking allegations emerged about Duke University's lacrosse team, prosecutor Mike Nifong was in court Tuesday — this time around as the defendant.The North Carolina State Bar charged the Durham County district attorney with several violations in the state's rules of professional conduct, all stuck just using his handling with the lacrosse case.Nifong won indictments against three lacrosse players this past year after a woman hired as a stripper for a team party in March 2006 said she was raped. One of three had graduated, but Duke suspended another two. Criticism of Nifong's evidence and handling in the case increased from the summer, then when the bar filed its initial ethics charges, Nifong turned true over to the state attorney general, who dropped each of the charges."This didn't have to happen, as well as the horrible consequences were entirely foreseeable," Katherine Jean, the bar official prosecuting Nifong, said during her 25-minute opening statement. "The harm carried out to these three young men as well as their families and the justice system of Nc is devastating."The state prosecutor argued Nifong was motivated by political ambition, CBS News national correspondent Byron Pitts reports. In the hotly contested re-election campaign, he played "the race card" just as one appeal to black voters.The hearing, which typically takes a day, could last until Saturday.As it started Tuesday, the hearing commission chairman promised a fast verdict. If convicted, Nifong could be disbarred.Reporters and observers — like the mothers of David Evans and Collin Finnerty, a couple of the once-charged and now cleared lacrosse players — packed the state Court of Appeals courtroom. Finnerty along with the third player, Reade Seligmann, are hoped for to attend the trial at some point. Attorneys for all three players were from the courtroom Tuesday.Nifong aggressively pursued the truth against the players, at some time calling the lacrosse team "a bunch of hooligans" in a newspaper interview.That interview, in addition to several others produced in the case's early days, formed the basis of the bar's initial complaint against Nifong, which said he made misleading and inflammatory comments to the media about the athletes."I believe you will hear him testify he regrets making those statements," said Nifong's attorney, David Freedman, as part of his opening statement.Freedman recounted abdominal muscles early days of the case, highlighting evidence he explained led Nifong to believe a criminal offense had occurred. "It isn't unethical to pursue what someone may believe to be an unwinnable case," he said.After months of silence and weeks to organize his defense, Nifong's lawyer made two basic claims, reports Pitts. He claimed that Nifong hadn't actually prosecuted an instance in years and was rusty. And the man didn't "withhold evidence," but failed to read an 1800-page report. Nifong's lawyer also claimed that this prosecutor never knew key DNA evidence was omitted.Some problem room laughed openly, reports Pitts. The bar also alleged that Nifong withheld evidence from defense attorneys anf the husband lied to both for the court and bar investigators.In her opening, Jean detailed Nifong's meetings using the director of a DNA laboratory he hired, from which she said Nifong found out that none of the players' DNA matched that material present in and on the accuser. The bar has accused Nifong of keeping those test comes from the defense.Nifong asked its northern border Carolina Attorney General's office to consider over the lacrosse prosecution in January. By then, most professionals and legal observers had for many years concluded the case can't be won.Vermont Attorney General Roy Cooper agreed in April and dropped all charges from the three players. In a stunning rebuke, Cooper said there was no rape or attack, calling the indicted players "innocent" victims of a rogue prosecutor's "tragic rush to accuse."Mike Pressler, the first kind lacrosse coach of Duke University, says he expects the prosecutor will probably be punished for the botched rape investigation.Pressler, who now coaches at Bryant University in Rhode Island, told a Providence radio station that Nifong is going to face a severe penalty for leading the investigation that targeted three of his former players."I think his reputation has already been gone," says Andrew Cohen, CBS News Legal Analyst. "What's at risk now is his livelihood." mulberry accessories
After two years of playing coy about his presidential ambitions, Mayor Michael Bloomberg declared in the newspaper editorial Wednesday that they will not run for president but might support the candidate who "takes an impartial, nonpartisan approach."The 66-year-old billionaire businessman, who aides said was prepared to spend $1 billion to operate as an independent, wrote in a editorial on The New York Times' Web site that he work to "steer the national conversation faraway from partisanship and toward unity; far from ideology and toward sound judgment; away from sound bites and toward substance."On Thursday, Bloomberg asserted the No. 2 job isn't an option either. "Nobody will ask me to operate as vice president," he said at a news conference. Said Bloomberg: "I've had a wonderful opportunity to influence the dialogue. ... I've said repeatedly when people focus on New York City and the mayor, it's good for New York City."Bloomberg, who may have almost two years left in his second term at City Hall, had publicly denied any interest in running for president since certainly one of his political advisers first planted the seed more than two years ago.But his denials grew weaker in recent months as aides and supporters quietly began laying the groundwork to get a third-party campaign."I listened carefully to those who encouraged me to own, but I am not - and does not be - a candidate for president," he wrote.Among his biggest obstacles was climbing on the ballot. The process varies wildly among states and would have required Bloomberg to collect hundreds of thousands of signatures as outlined by a strict timetable on what the first key date is March 5.Beginning next Wednesday, a Bloomberg campaign might have had to begin gathering signatures to get on the ballot in Texas, which includes one of the earliest deadlines.Bloomberg underwent extensive preparation for any presidential bid. The work included mass polling and nationwide data collection to ascertain his viability as being a candidate, as well as detailed study and preparation for a state-by-state ballot access drive.Aides and associates said in recent days that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's surge in the Democratic contest against New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was increasingly diminishing the possibility that Bloomberg would run."In citing the 'current campaigns,' Bloomberg is acknowledging there is no opening for a candidate who would seek a plurality of voters from the broad middle of the political spectrum," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "With presumptive GOP nominee John McCain and Democratic front-runner Barack Obama, there is no void inside the center for him to fill." (Continue reading analysis on Bloomberg from Ververs)Inside the Times editorial, Bloomberg wrote even though he is not running, the race is way too important for him to stay completely out."And i really have changed my head in one area," he stated. "If a candidate takes an impartial, nonpartisan approach - and embraces practical solutions that challenge party orthodoxy - I'll join others to help that candidate win the White House."Putting his endorsement - and wealth - behind one of the candidates could make a tremendous difference. And Bloomberg, a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent, has ties to Obama, Clinton and Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain.Last November, Bloomberg and Obama met in Manhattan for the highly publicized breakfast, and the mayor has praised a number of Obama's positions, for example supporting merit buy teachers.He also did closely with Clinton, his home state senator, and it has a friendly relationship with McCain.On Monday, Bloomberg defended Ralph Nader's to certainly seek the White House."This business of Ralph Nader as a spoiler - you know, in any three-way race, two of the three are going to be spoilers," Bloomberg said. "Come on. Everybody's have a right to do it - you are not spoiling anything."Bloomberg's friend and political ally California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has endorsed McCain, and also the senator said during a Republican debate that Bloomberg had done "remarkable things" with the city's education system, the country's largest. mulberry clipper
This column "On The Marc" is written by CBS News chief political consultant Marc Ambinder. That is amazing one hundred days and have passed, and you're within the alcove of the White House awaiting the following mission.What, realistically, does President barack obama hope to have gotten done by then?Aides hope the massive stimulus package, being passed and signed, will likely be stimulatin' away, although by May 1 you will have an effort by the government to offer the plan's effects for the American people. The theory is the fact that people need to have confidence the money is being put to good use now - which will keep interest rates under control.The next big priority is going to be financial regulation restructuring. Desperation is to have the law ready by April. The political will is there, but the subject is extremely complex and lobbyists will pour over this issue like ants over a lump of sugar.Mr. Obama may have either issued a professional order on stem cells, or Congress may have passed legislation that expands the lines designed for research.Mr. Obama will sign tough new ethics and disclosure rules into law.Conservative Democrats hope that Mr. Obama will have signed tough new budgeting rules into law -- whether these rules are contained in the budget process or whether they're promulgated separately is unknown. Medical will be making progress, as well as the contours of the legislation Mr. Obama would eventually sign will be made clear.So… what could be stalled? What will be considered a big challenge? Progress on his national security and foreign policy initiatives will probably be slight. Mr. Obama will probably have directed his generals to give him with a withdrawal technique for Iraq, but the larger and more complex question is what technique to adopt in Afghanistan.Some generals and administration advisers want an Iraq-like counterinsurgency doctrine. Others think that Mr. Obama should immediately begin talks with friendly Afghan Pashtuns (should there be any) and Iran, which sits, twiddling its thumbs, on Afghanistan's Western border.In their campaign, Mr. Obama promised a blast at the of troops to Afghanistan. Whether he'll act on his promise is by no means certain.And my prediction is that Democrats will spar amongst on their own on the next step in reviving the domestic auto industry. And then, on major energy legislation. The Democrats failed miserably of their effort to pass a cap-and-trade regime in 2008. Although public support will there be, the desire and will to change this system during the active phase overall economy isn't.Mr. Obama believes how the public needs to be educated on the will happen -- where they'll pay more, after they should expect to pay less -- and will take a while.And just how will Mr. Obama govern from the center?He'll contact people - but he'll need to do more than talk to them. If he wants bipartisan cooperation, he'll should incorporate bipartisan concerns within the legislation he advances and also the orders he signs. Doing so will put his political opponents in the bind - if Mr. Obama is perceived as being cooperative, then his opponents will look shrill if they reflexively oppose Mr. Obama's agenda.As my National Journal colleague Ron Brownstein notes, in case you look over Mr. Obama's campaign pledges, you can find mandates galore: mandatory increases in CAF? standards, mandatory requirements for insurers to issue policies to every one, mandatory extensions in paid leave.One critical indication of whether Mr. Obama intends to play nicely is whether or not he relaxes these mandates.Moreover, the Employee Free Choice Act, or "card check" legislation making it much easier for unions to set up, will be a critical test of whether there is a conflict between Mr. Obama's desire to build coalitions, and his desire to get big things done.By Marc Ambinder tall ugg boots
A former member of your home Intelligence Committee denied on Monday interceding in an investigation into two pro-Israel lobbyists now facing a shot on espionage charges.California Democrat Rep. Jane Harman's office said she "never contacted the Justice Department about its prosecution of present or former AIPAC employees, and also the Justice Department never informed her that she was or perhaps is the subject of or in an investigation."Congressional Quarterly, and then The New York Times, reported Monday that this National Security Agency intercepted phone calls between Harman and a supporter with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.In accordance with current and former government officials who spoke to CQ as well as the Times, she was overheard acknowledging seek favorable treatment from the Bush administration for two AIPAC lobbyists under investigation for spying. It had been unclear when the wiretaps occurred.In trade, the Times and CQ reported, the AIPAC supporter decided to pressure party leaders to appoint Harman to maneuver the House Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which Democrats were expected to win. Harman was the very best Democrat on the committee back then. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., appointed Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, for the job instead.In October 2006, a federal police officers official, speaking on condition of anonymity as a result of ongoing investigation, told The Associated Press that Harman's ties with AIPAC had been under scrutiny because the previous year. However, the inquiry had still did not turn up evidence of illegal activity, the official said back then.CQ said Harman was said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap provided to alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington. And despite reports that the Harman investigation was dropped for "lack of evidence," it turned out Alberto Gonzales, President George W. Bush's top counsel and then attorney general, who intervened to avoid the Harman probe.CQ said that according to three top former national security officials, Gonzales wanted Harman to be able to help defend the administration's warrantless wiretapping program, that has been about to be revealed by the days.The Times and CQ said Gonzales declined to comment through a spokesman.AIPAC lobbyists Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman were charged in 2005 with conspiring to have classified documents on issues strongly related U.S. policy, such as al Qaeda terror network, the bombing of the Khobar Towers dormitory in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. Air Force personnel, and U.S. policy in Iran - and after that sharing them with reporters and former diplomats.That espionage trial was set to begin with Tuesday in federal court in Alexandria, Va.The trial continues to be postponed at least nine times since the defense and prosecutors wrangled over how to deal with classified information in the trial.Harman's office dismissed Monday's news reports as "recycled."The statement failed to address whether Harman's calls ended up intercepted."If there is anything about it story that should arouse concern it is that the Bush administration was engaged in electronic surveillance of people in the congressional intelligence committees," Harman's statement said. bailey button ugg boots chestnut
Two-thirds of Americans say the fighting in Iraq may be beyond the U.S. military's ability to control, according to the latest CBS News poll. Just Twenty-five percent say the military might be effective in lessening the violence between Iraqis.The war continues to take a toll on opinions about President Bush – his approval rating to handle Iraq is just 27 percent, and his overall job approval is merely 32 percent – however the public is divided when it comes to what Congress should do about the war.While 63 percent disapprove of the president's plan to send more troops to Iraq, there exists a nearly even split on whether Congress should pass a nonbinding resolution expressing disapproval in the troop buildup: 44 percent favor passage of the measure and 45 percent are opposed. CAN U.S. MILITARY Be efficient IN LESSENING FIGHTING BETWEEN IRAQIS? Yes 25% No 67%A majority, 53 percent, thinks Congress should either block all funding for your war, or block funding for sending more troops; 42 percent think Congress should allow all funding for the war. Read the complete CBS News poll results. Opinions about both funding for that war and the congressional resolution are sharply divided by political party. A lot more than 7 in 10 Democrats favor blocking at least some moneys for that war, while 69 percent of Republicans want Congress allowing all funding. BUSH IRAQ APPROVAL Approve 27% Disapprove 68%BUSH OVERALL JOB APPROVAL Approve 32% Disapprove 59%A tastes Democrats, 57 percent, thinks Congress should pass the resolution against sending more troops, while 65 % of Republicans think it shouldn't be passed.Views of the way the war is going remain bleak and there's little sign that Americans start to see the situation in Iraq improving. Only one in four repeat the war is going well for the U.S., while 72 percent say it is going badly. WHAT SHOULD CONGRESS DO ABOUT FUNDING FOR WAR? Block all funding 8% Block funding for additional troops 45%Allow all funding42%Just one out of 10 say things in Iraq are becoming better, while half think everything is deteriorating. Another four in 10 think situations are staying about the same.Additionally, there is increasing concern that the war in Iraq could lead to a larger war in the center East. Fifty-nine percent now say a greater war is likely, a dramatic shift from April 2003, during the early stages of the war, when just 35 % thought that was likely. THINGS IN IRAQ ARE GETTING… Better 10% Worse 46% Staying precisely the same 41%Although U.S. military officials presented evidence over the weekend that Iran has been supplying weapons to Iraqi insurgents, just one in five Americans say Iran is really a threat requiring a military response now. Fifty-seven percent say Iran could be dealt with diplomatically, while 14 percent don't see Iran as a threat now.Looking ahead to the 2008 presidential campaign, about 25 percent of voters say a candidate's stand on Iraq will serve like a litmus test for getting in touch with vote for them. Nine percent say they'll only back an applicant who supports the war, while 15 percent will only back an anti-war candidate.Most voters say the war will be an important factor in their decision on whom to guide - but not the only person. Seventy-three percent say a candidate's position on Iraq, and also other issues, will determine how they vote. For details on how CBS News conducts public opinion surveys, click here. This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,142 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone February 8-11, 2007. The mistake due to sampling for results depending on the entire sample could possibly be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher. best ugg boots
http://shuigongye.cn/about/common/userloginstate.aspx
http://hata.profi.co.ua/user/zuiaimiuroqu/
http://makeprofitsautopilot.com/wp-admin/profile.php
[url=http://www.goodbootshome.co.uk/fine-ugg-bailey-button-chestnut-p-367.html]ugg bailey button chestnut[/url]
|
| |
| |
