| zuiaipiugoik | Date: Sunday, 01 Dec 2013, 4:45 AM | Message # 1 |
|
Lieutenant
Group: Users
Messages: 48
Status: Offline
| Sen. Hillary Clinton and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani continue to set the pace from the 2008 presidential race, in accordance with the latest CBS News/New York Times poll, but both are facing some new challenges. Giuliani's lead over his top Republican rivals is down, while his negative ratings are up; Clinton's lead over her Democratic opponents increased, but she's lost support to Sen. Barack Obama among critical African-American voters.The poll finds Democratic primary voters continue being more satisfied with their party's presidential contenders than Republicans are with theirs. This is a change from past elections, when Democrats were rather less satisfied than Republicans using their candidate options. SATISFIED Along with your PARTY'S PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDERS? Republican Primary VotersSatisfied 38%Want more choices 57% Democratic Primary VotersSatisfied 63%Want more choices 35% The electorate all together is also more satisfied using the Democratic candidates: 49 percent of voters say they prefer to vote for the Democratic nominee for president, while 33 percent say they'll vote for the Republican. Looking at the Republican campaign, Giuliani's lead has slipped since a few weeks ago in a three-way contest with Sen. John McCain and former Gov. Mitt Romney. The benefactors: Romney, and "none of the aforementioned." Giuliani still leads the Republican pack at 36 percent, down from 47 percent last month. McCain is next at 22 percent, down 3 points since April. Romney is third at 15 %, a 5-point increase from last month.In another sign of GOP discontent using the current front-runners, the number saying they do not want any of those three rose 8 points to 21 percent.Years back THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, Who YOU WANT AS REP NOMINEE? (Among Republican Primary Voters)NowGiuliani 36%McCain 22% Romney 15% Someone else/none 21% 4/2007Giuliani 47%McCain 25% Romney 10% Someone else/none 13% Negative ratings for McCain and Giuliani have risen. McCain's favorable ratings now are nearly even with his unfavorable ratings. Giuliani still gets mostly positive reviews, but his negatives are up, too.Republican primary voters have become more familiar with Romney, and the result has been positive for him. He's viewed favorably by the majority of those who have an opinion. The poll also viewed the volatile issue of abortion and located that Giuliani leads among the six in 10 Republican primary voters who does allow abortions in a minimum of some form; also, he leads, though by an extremely smaller margin, one of many four in 10 who refuse abortions should be permitted.Giuliani can be considered the most moderate of the three top Republicans. Less than half of GOP primary voters say he shares Republican values.On the Democratic side, Clinton has increased her lead over Obama, her top rival, to 22 points. Clinton could be the choice of 46 percent of primary voters, followed by Obama at 24 percent and former Sen. John Edwards at 14 percent. IF THESE WERE THE CANDIDATES, Who YOU WANT AS DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE? (Among Democratic Primary Voters)NowClinton 46%Obama 24% Edwards 14% 4/2007Clinton 39%Obama 24% Edwards 21% Clinton's support is 7 points greater month ago, while Obama's has stayed steady and Edwards' has dropped 7 points.But Among African-American voters, Obama now runs about even with Clinton. In the combined March and April polls, only one-third of African-American Democrats said they were backing Obama.Seventy one of the top contenders are believed to be positively by the Democratic primary voters. Clinton is the foremost known of the three and has the highest favorable rating at 62 percent; she also has the highest unfavorable rating at 14 percent. For detailed information on what CBS News conducts public opinion surveys, click here. This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1125 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone May 18-23, 2007. Larger than fifteen due to sampling for results using the entire sample could possibly be plus or minus three percentage points. The big mistake for subgroups is higher. An oversample of African Americans has also been conducted for this poll, for a total of 192 interviews among this group. The outcome were then weighted compared to the racial composition in the adult population from the U.S. Census. The margin of error for African Americans is plus or minus 7 percentage points. ugg australia bailey button triplet boots
Discovery's astronauts aimed for midday touchdown Wednesday in conclusion a 15-day mission that saved a place station wing and allowed construction to continue at the orbiting outpost.Forecasters failed to expect the weather to obstruct Discovery's planned landing at Kennedy Space Center.This is actually the first shuttle method of cross the U.S. since the Columbia accident showered North Texas with debris almost 5yrs ago, reports CBS News correspondent Peter King (audio) . Ever since then, NASA has studied the matter and determined a proper orbiter poses no risk for the population."The studies took under consideration populations across the country, as well as systems on board the orbiter," said entry flight director Bryan Lunney.The ship's first landing path would make crew over far western Canada, the truly great Plains and several Southern states.If water or other problems force NASA to scrub the landing attempt, the shuttle's second opportunity would come with flying over several Western states, Texas and Louisiana."I don't have Edwards or Northrop called up whatsoever," said Lunney. Edwards Air Force Base is in southern California, the Northrop Strip at White Sands, N.M.Because shuttle comes in to get a landing in Florida, residents of eastern states just might see the plasma trail."I would say at the very least in the middle, to the eastern side of the us, they'd be able to see something if they're directly beneath the ground track," Lunney said. "It's really worth the sight, assuming they need no clouds above them.""I hoped that everybody would have the opportunity to watch us are available in, and I hope they like the view," said Discovery commander Pam Melroy. Mission managers decided Tuesday that Discovery was safe for re-entry after examining the results of multiple thermal shield inspections.Discovery blasted off on Oct. 23 over a mission that was considered the most challenging and complex inside the nine years of orbital assembly in the international space station.The crew delivered and installed a whole new pressurized compartment called Harmony, that will serve as a docking port for future laboratories, and moved a massive solar power tower half the size of a football field towards the far left end with the station.The mission took a remarkable turn, however, when one of several tower's giant solar wings ripped in 2 places as the astronauts unfurled them as soon as the move."Those arrays weren't designed to be worked on. That they to improvise this, and yes it was critical," says CBS News space consultant Bill Harwood. "They needed to fix that solar array to the way for continued assembly, so they really could have the power they desire for European and Japanese research modules which can be coming up in December, February and April."Saturday's emergency repair from the torn wing was an unprecedented and daring feat whipped up by flight controllers in just a few days.Standing at no more a 90-foot robotically operated boom, spacewalker Scott Parazynski stretched his 6-foot-2 frame to chop the tangled wires that snagged the wing and install homemade braces.He was farther away from the safe confines in the station than another astronaut had ever been, anf the husband was mere inches outside the wing, which was coursing with over 100 volts of electricity.The torn wing was one of two space station power issues that emerged during Discovery's visit. Steel shavings put together inside a rotary joint had to turn another set of solar wings in the orbiting outpost. mulberry outlet bicester
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks on Friday skidded sharply lower following your government said the nation's jobless rate in May soared to.5%, the highest since October 2004, and as the price of crude-oil futures shot higher to above $134 a barrel."The jobs report will probably dominate everyone's attention," said Phil Orlando, equity market strategist at Federated Investors. "The nonfarm payrolls data was fine. Actually, it was a little much better than expected, but what will be the headline in every paper in America tomorrow will be the unemployment rate spiked in order to 5.5%." Economists had forecast a much smaller 0.1 percentage point grow in the unemployment rate, to.1%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 213.16 points, or 1.7%, to 12,3921.29, with one of 30 blue-chips -- Chevron Corp. -- going up, its shares up 0.4%.American International Group Inc. and Gm Corp. were among those weighing heavily on the Dow, with AIG down 6.3% and GM off 2.5%.The S&P 500 fell 20.15 points, or 1.4%, to 1,383.9, with financials and consumer discretionary leading sector declines, both off 2.6%.Energy proved the only person of 10 S&P industry group posting gains, up 0.5%.The technology-dominated Nasdaq Composite shed 35.95 points, or 1.4%, to 2,513.99."If people over the course of the day start to target wage inflation, nonfarm numbers, and so on, we might do better following a sloppy opening. Or, investors might wish to shift to the price <rise> of crude over the past two days, and sell on that," Orlando said.Crude movesCrude oil was sharply higher for any second straight day. The July-dated light crude contract jumped up $6.41 to $134.2 a barrel, after hitting $134.5 earlier on the New York Mercantile Exchange."Tough talk from Israel, where the state run there said attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities looked 'unavoidable,' has ramped up geopolitical concerns. If all of that is not enough, a U.S. investment bank has raised its oil price forecast to $150 a barrel by July 4th," said analysts at Action Economics.On Thursday, crude futures bounced off a vital support level of $122 a barrel, but the bounce was "a bounce with steroids," Orlando said.Friday's volume about the New York Stock Exchange neared 347 million, with decliners topping advancing issues over 3 to 1. On the Nasdaq, 241 million shares switched hands, and declining stocks outran those advancing nearly 4 to 1.On Thursday, U.S. stocks snapped a three-session losing streak, rallying strongly after better-than-expected weekly jobless claims data and a strong May sales report from retailing giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. .For the heels of that report, Wal-Mart is holding its annual investors' meeting. Active issuesShares of National Semiconductor Corp. shares rose 7.2% in recent trade after it beat earnings and sales forecasts.The Wall Street Journal reported American International Group is under inquiry as the Securities and Exchange Commission examines the blue-chip insurance giant's involvement in credit default swaps. The Journal also reported National City Corp. is under heightened scrutiny from federal regulators. Other medium-sized banks can also be likely being monitored as regulators push lenders to increase more capital and improve risk management, the newspaper said. And in the banking sector, Societe Generale downgraded Swiss institutions UBS and Credit Suisse to trade from hold, saying it expects it banking sector to view revenue fall returning to 2005 levels.Best to buy Co. Inc. fell 4.8% after its downgrade to keep from buy at Deutsche Bank, which cited increased competition from Wal-Mart.In deal news, Dutch chip-equipment manufacturer ASM International stated it received a preliminary approach from Applied Materials about potentially buying two sections for $400 million to $00 million.By Kate Gibson mulberry handbag outlet
A diverse coalition of advocacy groups has united behind an agenda that recommends regulations and tax breaks and an expansion of existing government programs to scale back the number of Americans who lack medical insurance.The groups, representing doctors, insurers, employers and patients, have already been working behind the scenes for nearly two years to address an issue that has garnered increased attention by both individuals and officials.Unlike a great many other countries, the United States does not have a universal health care program. In addition, companies have sought to trim costs by either passing it on to workers a more substantial share of the insurance costs or cutting programs — efforts that have strained household budgets.California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has said he wants to implement a universal medical program in the state, and Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy has stated the federal government should join his home condition of Massachusetts in enacting this type of plan.The new Democratic-led Congress has spawned a flurry of legislation and news conferences, all meant to promote an array of bills and concepts that would reduce the ranks of the uninsured, which is now projected at 46.6 million.The proposal unveiled Thursday sticks out because the groups involved are extremely influential, and, as they are so different. Their ranks add the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and also the American Medical Association."We achieved what many thought could be impossible," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a liberal-leaning advocacy group.The advocates' first priority would be to focus on children. The general public strongly supports covering children, plus they are less expensive to cover since they typically have fewer health problems, said the Health Coverage Coalition for your Uninsured. The coalition's proposals were summarized inside a background paper presented to members.The coalition envisions a "one-stop shopping" center that will let uninsured children be automatically going to other means-tested programs for example discount school lunches and food stamps. Lawmakers will probably be asked to appropriate more income for the State Children's Health care insurance Program. The program covers about 5 million individuals who live in families with incomes too low to qualify for Medicaid although not high enough to afford well being services on their own.The initiative also creates a new tax credit built to make it easier for families with incomes below 300 percent of poverty to pay for insurance for both adults and kids.The coalition also seeks an growth of Medicaid for adults whose incomes are under the poverty level. Federal funds would be increased to help buy the expansion, but the brief provides no specifics of the costs. Nor does it state the size of the tax credit that the groups are seeking.Rolling around in its agreement, the coalition avoided possibly the toughest question of: How to pay for the recommendations? The proposals for children alone will cost around $45 billion over five-years. But coalition members may not take a position about how it must be paid for, except to convey they envision that the amount would be covered by the government."The cost of not doing anything is much more dramatic," said Dr. Reed Tuckson, senior v . p . of the United Health Foundation.But finding $45 billion requires tough trade-offs, such as tax increases or budget cuts in other government programs. Then opposition to the proposals would likely surface.Coalition members said they wanted to provide a road map and then leave to Congress the determination of what's necessary to stick to the map."Our intention would have been to outline the elements necessary to solve this problem. Our goal has not been to write legislative specifications," said a quick outlining the coalition's recommendations. chestnut bailey button uggs
The notion advanced by enthusiasts of "Health 2.0" is both easy and appealing. A new generation of interactive Web services, people say, will arm people who have data, tools and supportive online communities so they can take charge of their own medical care -- and in turn transform the broken U.S. healthcare system from the bottom up by demanding better service and minimize costs.Which is all fine and beautiful but for one thing: What type of revolutionary effects can you really expect if lots of people don't want to -- or simply can't -- empower themselves by doing this?A common response -- one I heard many times at a recent Health 2.0 gathering in San Diego -- is that there simply defintely won't be many such people, for the reason that benefits of tracking and managing your personal health the way you might day-trade stocks or restore an old-fashioned car are just too great to become ignored. In fact, though, it could be the self-actualized, Web-empowered medical consumers who fall into the minority.From the Health 2.0 Blog, appropriately enough, healthcare analyst Brian Klepper recaps a few of the latest data about the subject based on a recent talk by Kaveh Safavi, the main medical officer of Thomson Healthcare's Solucient analysis unit. It's sobering indeed for your folks expecting Health 2.0 to launch a consumer-driven healthcare revolution.The slide at right (click for a larger image), for instance, signifies that such "quality-driven" individuals -- looked as folks who would both search for ratings information on doctors and hospitals and then act on it by switching to some better-rated care provider if needed -- make up just 19 percent of the adult U.S. population. A complete third simply go with the flow, neither researching nor changing, while almost two-fifths would change providers, however for reasons having not do with quality ratings (this latter group, Klepper notes, might as well be nicknamed "Ignorance on Fire"). Unsurprisingly, quality-driven consumers tend to be older and wealthier as opposed to general population.While these figures may possibly shift over time, the well-known conclusion in the short term is that empowering consumers only gets you thus far in terms of driving systemic healthcare change -- the rest is up to many of the very institutions in charge of the healthcare mess to start with. Which, however, is not entirely bad news, no less than as Klepper sees it: <T>he subtext of the information is undoubtedly that this most important changes arriving health care will occur installing the ways that consumers get and act on information, but also in the ways that organizations - healthcare and non-health care businesses - do. Despite the fact that health care information may have serious utility for people, many of us simply don't appear to be built to chase and use it. Businesses are different though. The majority are based on a discipline of doing so, and they succeed or fail on their ability to use information effectively. I am hoping he's right, and be sure, there are already a couple of instances of Health 2.0 startups like Healthline aiding health plans like Aetna in offering more personalized services to their members. I'd count on seeing more deals like that going forward, and how they fare will tell us a lot about what we can really expect from health-related Web services in a global sense.The Solucient data also offers important ramifications for "consumer-directed healthcare" -- the notion that making individuals to blame for their medical expenses, usually with many help from health-savings accounts and high-deductible plans, will fix the ailing healthcare system via the magic of market competition. If you think this is a good idea (I am a skeptic, myself), surely a consumer-driven system would have to have the engagement of more than 19 percent of people to even have a shot at living up to its promise. ugg knitted boots
There is more evidence the American love affair with coffee helps to reduce the risk of diabetes.Drinking caffeinated coffee is discovered to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by as much as 60 percent within a newly published study that included people at dangerous for the disease.Even those who used to drink coffee but quit were less likely to develop diabetes compared to those who never drank it.The modern study was published inside the November issue of the journal Diabetes Care ."Our findings were quite strong," researcher Besa Smith, MPH, tells WebMD. "The next thing is to pinpoint the compounds in coffee to blame for this protective effect."The new information is not the first to discover that coffee drinkers have an edge in terms of protection from diabetes.A Finnish study, reported in 2004, suggested a 30 percent reduction in type 2 diabetes risk among those who drank three or four cups of coffee a day. Women from the study who drank 10 or even more cups a day showed a 79 percent decrease in risk.And combined is caused by 15 studies involving over 200,000 participants suggested the same protective effect. People who drank the most coffee had the best diabetes risk inside the review, conducted by researchers from your Harvard School of Public Health.An exceptional StudyThe study by Smith and colleagues from your University of California North park was unique because it included people at high-risk for type 2 diabetes whose blood sugar were higher than normal.The situation, known as impaired glucose tolerance, is recognized as a strong predictor of diabetes.A total of 910 adults were followed with an average of eight years after an evaluation of their coffee drinking habits was conducted. The common age of the participants was 66; 41 percent were men.After adjusting for other known diabetes risk factors, the researchers concluded that both past and current drinkers of caffeinated coffee had of a 60 percent reduction in diabetes risk, in comparison with study participants who never drank coffee.The same reduction in risk was seen one of the roughly one-third of study participants with impaired glucose tolerance.The researchers did not exclude individuals who drank decaffeinated coffee from the study, but an inadequate number of participated to draw conclusions.Trying to find a ReasonIt is not clear how coffee affects diabetes risk, but Smith says the rewards are probably not as a result of caffeine."It appears there are other compounds in coffee responsible for this," she says.Studies are needed to isolate the component or components accountable for the protective effect against diabetes, Smith says.She adds that it must be premature to recommend coffee drinking as being a public health way of lowering the risk of diabetes.American Diabetes Association spokesman Larry Deeb, MD, agrees. But according to him there is little evidence that drinking coffee is detrimental for people with diabetes.Deeb directs the diabetes center at Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare hospital; he or she is president of medicine and science to the American Diabetes Association."People with diabetes and those at risk for developing diabetes have adequate to worry about," Deeb tells WebMD. "It is nice to know that coffee isn't one of them, and it may actually help lower risk." mulberry brynmore
First it was banks and insurance providers. Then it was Detroit. Now official Washington is abuzz with talk of bailing out newspapers. A Senate hearing the other day explored the topic. An invoice to restructure newspapers has been introduced in the U.S. Congress. And Barack obama announced last week that the disappearance of newspapers "is not an option for the United States of America." Bailing out those other industries was unwise and lacks authority in the limited powers that this U.S. Constitution grants the us government. It drew corporate America deeper to the federal government's firm embrace, and risks politicizing routine business decisions and so that it is more difficult for struggling firms to secure credit.But a minimum of those bailouts funneled taxpayer dollars to industries which will eventually rise off their sickbeds. Consumers may not adore General Motors' current lineup, but they'll still buy cars and trucks. Banks and insurance agencies have not been deserted by their clients. Not so with newspapers. Because of classified ad revenue nibbled away by famous brands Craigslist, eBay, Monster.com, and Autotrader.com, newspapers are stored on track to experience a dizzying 50 percent drop in advertising revenues on the three-year period. Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and other ad networks have meant more competition -- and more options for advertisers. Highly localized ads on cable have accelerated this trend. Not helping could be the sentiment that newspapers -- and, perhaps, most of the mainstream media -- have abandoned editorial neutrality in favor of political boosterism. The Pew Research Center's Problem for Excellence in Journalism reports that 70 percent of Americans thought professional journalists wished to see Barack Obama win the presidential election (Mr. Obama apparently agrees). Only 9 percent thought journalists were rooting for John McCain.No surprise that Warren Buffet, whose Berkshire Hathaway holding company owns a large chunk of the Washington Post Company , said this month that he would not buy most newspapers today "at any price." A few of the proposals to rescue the newspaper industry are reasonable. Antitrust law tends to be overreaching; an exemption much like what Major League Baseball enjoys is overdue. Washington state's tax cut approved soon brings newspapers' rate as a result of what Boeing and the timber industry already pay. Others aren't as sound. Democratic Sen. Benjamin Cardin's bill allows newspapers to become non-profit organizations when the IRS deems them "necessary or valuable in achieving an educational purpose," an expression that invites definitional mischief. President Nixon ordered the government to audit political enemies, and President Roosevelt ugg broome boots
Rescuers searching for 65 trapped coal miners broke with an enormous wall of debris Thursday, finding high numbers of methane gas but no sign of two workers who had been thought to be there.The discoveries dimmed desires the miners trapped since a Sunday morning explosion, but authorities refused to rule out the chance of survival.Officials said the degrees of toxic gas were increasing as rescuers advanced deeper in the mine, but they stopped lacking saying they thought the miners were dead."The air since the rescue advances is increasingly lacking in oxygen and more laden with methane, rendering it less breathable," federal Labor Secretary Francisco Salazar told loved ones and news reporters gathered away from gates of the Pasta de Conchos mine."The the weather is becoming increasingly adverse," added mine administrator Ruben Escudero. "It is grave, and being realistic, we presume the situation is difficult." He declined to elaborate.Four experts through the U.S. Mine Safety Administration entered the mine's tunnels Thursday with equipment to determine gas levels, Salazar said.Coahuila Gov. Humberto Moreira Valdes, that is monitoring the rescue efforts, told W Radio on Thursday that this results of the experts' tests were expected later Thursday and allows officials to determine the miners' possibilities of survival.Escudero told a news conference that rescuers had advanced 740 yards inside the mine, about 110 yards beyond where two conveyor belt operators were thought to be trapped.Officials earlier said that the condition of the two men might offer a hint about the fate from the other workers.But Escudero said there was no sign of them, that he said meant they either ended up buried under debris or were inside a different part of the mine.Rescuers manipulate picks, shovels, as well as their hands — in lieu of power machinery — to avoid more explosions. After four times of digging narrow passages through a huge selection of tons of rubble, they insisted they would not give up."We will not abandon our comrades, dead or alive," said Alvaro Cortes, his face lined with exhaustion and blackened with coal as he ended a search shift early Thursday."We all need to find them and end this episode," said Ruben Quintero, who emerged in the tunnel late Wednesday night.Escudero said 72 workers laboring 24 / 7 had removed 660 to 880 a lot of debris since they began the rescue operation.Oxygen was being pumped to a area of the mine which had been cleared with the hope that rescuers could shed their heavy oxygen tanks and work faster. Escudero also said tubes water were scattered throughout the mine. While not created for drinking, they could be consumed for unexpected expenses.Mine operators say the blast was a car accident and the mine, about 85 miles southwest of Eagle Pass, Texas, had passed recent government inspections.But several miners interviewed by The Associated Press spoke of being sent into dangerously unstable shafts without training or proper equipment."They offer you basic equipment with out training," said Clemente Rivera, 28, a Pasta de Conchos mine worker whose two cousins along with a neighbor remain trapped.The national miners' union said late Wednesday that workers had gone on strike against mine owner Grupo Mexico SA de CV at the very least 14 times, "not limited to salary increases ... but due to the constant refusal to examine security and health measures."Juan Rebolledo, Grupo Mexico's v . p . of international affairs, told the AP by telephone that such issues ended up addressed in a contract that both the company and the union had signed."This is not the moment to be arguing together with the union, when we must focus on the rescue," he stated.Relatives interviewed by the AP declared that many of the trapped coal miners might have carried less than one hour of oxygen in "self-rescue" tanks — not the 6 hours officials had reported earlier.While oxygen tanks were scattered throughout the mine, Rebolledo said that they were for "temporary situations," understanding that the mine's ventilation system was more important to the trapped miners' survival."The (ventilation) product is working," he was quoted saying. "But we don't know if the air is getting to them or maybe if it's contaminated." mulberry handbags ebay
http://pathfinderfoundation.org/comments-live-discussion/feeds/comments-live-discussion/users/zuiaisiuoohr
http://www.nannu.info/forum/member.php?u=125423
http://thecheckoutgirls.co.uk/wp-admin/profile.php
[url=http://www.goodbootshome.co.uk/fine-ugg-bailey-button-chestnut-p-367.html]ugg bailey button chestnut[/url]
|
| |
| |
