| markmiuselc | Date: Friday, 29 Nov 2013, 9:50 PM | Message # 1 |
|
Private
Group: Users
Messages: 19
Status: Offline
| This story was written by Ben Rowley, Daily Mississippian Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is perhaps the most well-known civil rights activist ever. Dr. King and the march on Washington descended on U.S.'s capital on August 28, 1963. Here he delivered his famous "I Have a very Dream" speech. In it he explained, "The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community should never lead us to a distrust of most white people, for most of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, began to realize that their destiny is involved in our destiny. "They began to realize that their freedom is inextricably certain to our freedom. We simply cannot walk alone." The ascendancy of blacks to civil and political prominence is a huge long journey. The imminent nomination of Sen. Barack Obama as the Democratic party's presidential nominee shouldn't be mistaken as the culmination on this journey. Obama's nomination shouldn't give us a false sense of hope that we have come to an America without any racial division. Instead, Obama's nomination should be viewed as a sign that racial divisions are receding and will be counted as a great victory for blacks. An important American political party is near nominating the son of your Kenyan immigrant father and a Caucasian mother from Kansas. The struggle to close the racial divide has become perpetuated by the blood, sweat and tears of whites and blacks alike. Blacks have paid the very best price in their find it difficult to achieve social, civil and political equality; however, as noted by Dr. King, white Americans have often fought alongside black Americans. As one example of this claim, one need take a look at Neshoba County, Miss, where the infamous 1964 civil rights murders of three activists included one black male and a couple white males who were investigating the burning of the black church. Dr. King understood a very important fact: "brother" does not denote color. The rise of Obama to presidential nominee is a great achievement; however, limiting the observance on this achievement to only black Americans detracts from the true significance of this event. We as individual races usually do not walk alone. Our existences are intertwined. Equally as Bill Clinton could not are already elected without the support of blacks, Obama could not have secured his party's nomination with no support of white voters, and even though this event marks a victory for blacks, what's more, it marks a great step forward for the U.S. in spite of political allegiance. A June 4 CBS News Poll showed 77 percent of registered voters nationwide said race wasn't an issue in their choice. The fact that 77 percent of voters believe that race is a non-issue shows that Dr. King's belief is finally being realized. People understand our destinies aren't just linked but are the same. There can be no black destiny, no white destiny - only our destiny. The first black presidential nominee could only attain this type of notable position in the America that had made great strides since tumultuous 1960s. These strides were not limited to the black community - although I hate making that distinction. The American community made great strides as well. It is not the appearance of color though the connotations of color that are the enemy to progress on the racial front, and 77 percent of Americans say race is often a non-issue. Isn't that the goal: for race becoming a non-issue? Given the history of the University of Mississippi, its progress in race relations and it is strong desire for equality and diversity, it is only fittin that Obama will arrive about the Ole Miss campus this fall - the identical campus James Meredith integrated on Oct. 1, 1962 - to debate the Republican presidential nominee on topics pertinent for the future of our nation. Determining not just blacks, however for all Americans, for social, civil and political equality will take its next step forward from the campus. house of fraser mulberry
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks on Thursday opened higher following a six-day string of losses, after International Business Machines Corp. topped profit estimates and reaffirmed its forecast, contributing to optimism fueled by report that the government might purchase stakes in U.S. banks.The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 144.01 points to 9,402.11, with 25 of its 30 components trading higher in the early going.Bank of America Corp. led blue-chip gains, its recently battered stock climbing 6.6%.Gm Corp. proved the heaviest weight around the Dow industrials, with the automaker's stock falling 6.1%.The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit its peak exactly one year ago, and has since lost nearly 35% of their value.The S&P 500 gained 15.48 suggests 1,000.42, with materials, energy and data technology leading sector advances one of many index's 10 industry groups.The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite rose 34.4 suggests 1,774.73, bolstered by IBM releasing its third-quarter earnings before schedule, reporting a 20% profit rise and reiterating its 2008 outlook."The news could provide some solace, pursuing the stock's recent pain. Having said that, we think the enormous level of investor fear over the lingering effects of the financial services morass into it spending could keep IBM along with other IT hardware stocks under time limits in the near term," said J.P. Morgan analysts. .The stock market's advance comes one day after the U.S. Fed, European Central Bank, Bank of England and other central banks made coordinated rate cuts. The moves gave the impression to make little influence on Wednesday with the Dow industrials dropping 189 points, the Nasdaq Composite falling 14 points and the S&P 500 shedding 11 points."Despite poor people close, I do think were finally at the point in which the short-term downside risk is minimal. Whilst the upside might take time to develop, recession, earnings, and a credit crisis are discounted," said Marc Pado, U.S. market strategist at Miller Tabak.In accordance with a report, the Treasury Department is considering a strategy to take ownership stakes in several U.S. banks, both healthy and troubled, The brand new York Times reported, citing unnamed government officials. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said within a speech Wednesday that he has the authority for this under the $700 billion bailout plan. Britain on Wednesday announced a similar plan, though no U.K. bank confirmed has taken government cash. "If Paulson heeds the advice of (U.K. Prime Minister Gordon) Brown and (Chancellor Alistair) Darling, the possibilities that the U.S. economy will be steered away from a deep recession extending through 2009 will be greatly improved," said economists at RDQ Economics.Within a related note, the Fed late Wednesday said it will lend $37.8 billion in many cash to American International Group Inc. for domestic insurance coverage subsidiaries in return for investment grade fixed-income securities. Stock futures had held a young advance after the Labor Department reported a decline in weekly jobless claims, which fell by 20,000 to 478,000 a week ago. .Overseas, Iceland nationalized its largest bank, Kaupthing, while three governments in Europe guaranteed the borrowings of Dexia immediately after a week after injecting nearly $9 billion to the bank.The Businesses prohibition against short-selling financials expired at midnight.The world's top steelmaker, ArcelorMittal , reiterated its third-quarter profit guidance and said second-half operating profit will grow, lifting shares from the steelmaker 10% in Paris.Retail-sector updates generally skewed towards the downside, with Abercrombie & Fitch Co. , Pier 1 Imports Inc. and Stage Stores Inc. each issuing profit warnings.By Kate Gibson ugg adirondack boot ii sale
Donny Deutsch screams for revenge as recession hits people he knows (i.e. the super rich) -- Bernie Madoff can be a "serial killer," former adman turned gazillionaire Deutsch told Jim Cramer during Mad Money Thursday, who "belongs within a cage tomorrow." "He didn't take action with homicide," Deutsch continued, "but should we let serial killers from bail?" The fogeys of Deutsch's close friends lost $4 million to Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme. "Every penny gone," the first kind Big Idea host said, visibly agitated. Hence the fact that Madoff isn't yet in prison is "an abomination." BNET's take: It might be nice to see Donny have this riled up about average Americans who have "only" lost their 401ks and jobs. <Source> CNBC]Saatchi Wins Kroger, Appleton in Canada -- Kroger Brands U.S.A., situated in Cincinnati, is one of the largest retail food companies inside the America. Saatchi & Saatchi has been named Agency of Record, and will also be creating campaigns to air nationally across America. The Appleton Jamaica Rum win puts Saatchi & Saatchi in the alcoholic beverage business since the Agency of Record for your brand in Canada. Responsibilities will likely be for advertising and media programs for both the English and French markets. <Source> Design Taxi]Valassis Communications files countersuit against Fraser Papers -- Fraser Papers Ltd. filed the suit recently in US District Court, alleging that Valassis owes it greater than $900,000 for nearly Two million pounds of specialty paper it shipped on the a North Carolina Valassis facility it's never paid for. However, inside the counterclaim Valassis states that Fraser supplied Valassis with defective paper. <Source> DM News]Brit advertisers run old ads rather than commissioning new creative -- Guinness and Hovis both running classics. May seem like a money-saver. <Source> FT]London cops appoint Abbot Mead Vickers BBDO to handle advertising -- The appointment, which comes into effect in April, follows a three-way pitch this included Golley Slater and incumbent agency MCBD that has handled the are the cause of the last five years. Campaign issues will handle knife crime, terrorism and also the Safer Neighbourhoods programme. <Source> Marketing Magazine]Y&R campaign to guard sharks -- Direct mail item unfolds into a bloody severed shark's fin, an example of cruel treating increasingly endangered beasts of the sea. <Source> Some guy's blog]French ban cell phone ads targeting kids -- All advertising in the devices to children under 12 will be prohibited under the legislation ?€" announced by the Environment Minister, Jean-Louis Borloo, last week ?€" anf the husband will also take powers to ban the sale of any phone designed to provide by those under six. <Source> Independent]Super Bowl ads anticipated to be subdued -- BNET mentioned so. <Source> SF Gate]Clear Channel settles suit on patent infringement -- A federal jury discovered that the largest U.S. radio broadcaster had infringed patents on the radio advertisement-management system. It ordered the organization to pay $66 million.The dispute was over San Antonio-based Clear Channel's program that manages radio spots across more than 1,000 stations for them to price the ads to find the most revenue. No settlement terms were disclosed. The verdict came in April on the suit filed by closely held Grantley Patent Holdings. Grantley, founded by Texas inventor Billy Shane Fox, owns patents for software which enables set the price on ads, according to the company's attorneys. <Source> Miami Herald]Uniqlo appoints Tribal DDB and PHD -- Creative and media chores assigned in Singapore as two stores check out launch in the Lion City - marking asia casual wear brand's first foray into Southeast Asia. <Source> Brand Republic] ugg mini
Rejecting calls to leave Iraq, President George W. Bush is ordering gradual U.S. troop reductions from other highest level of world war 2 and says more forces can come home as progress is done. At the same time, he says Iraq needs "an enduring relationship with America."In a Thursday night address televised from his presidential Oval Office, Mr. Bush presented his technique for reducing U.S. forces. "The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is: return on success. The more successful we are, greater American troops can return home."With no dramatic difference in course, the president's decision sets activity is for a fiery political debate in Congress as well as in the 2008 presidential campaign. Democrats said Mr. Bush's approach was unacceptable.Sen. Jack Reed, an old Army Ranger who delivered the Democratic reply to President Bush's speech, said that "once again, the president still did not provide either a prefer to successfully end world war 2 or a convincing rationale to continue it."Reed said Democrats is acceptable to "profoundly change our military involvement in Iraq."Mr. Bush approved the advice of Gen. David Petraeus, the superior U.S. commander in Iraq, to withdraw five combat brigades - a minimum of 21,500 forces - plus an undetermined number of support troops by July. The reductions represented just a slight hastening of the originally scheduled end in the troop increase announced in January.The White House said 5,700 troops will likely be home by Christmas.Petraeus' recommendations "basically gave Republicans who are still with the president about this … a reason to stay together with the president," said CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. 9 p.m.: Live Webcast With the President's Address Mr. Bush's speech was the latest turning point in a 4 1/2-year-old war marred by miscalculations, surprises and setbacks.Almost since the fall of Baghdad, in April 2003, U.S. commanders and administration officials in Washington mistakenly believed they were on track to winding down U.S. involvement and handing on the Iraqis. Instead, the insurgency intervened along with the reality of a country in chaos conspired to deepen the U.S. commitment.Mr. Bush said the U.S. engagement will stretch beyond his presidency, requiring military, financial and political support from Washington. He stated Iraqi leaders "have asked for the perfect relationship with America. And we are ready to begin building that relationship in a fashion that protects our interests in the area and requires many fewer American troops."Bush said his strategy - to go out of about 130,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq to remain fighting - bridges the desires of people that want to bring troops home and those that believe that success in Iraq is crucial to U.S. security."The solution I have described tonight gives them every opportunity, for the first time in years, for those who have been on opposite sides of this difficult debate to come together," Bush said.That appeared unlikely, however, using the reaction of Democratic leaders who want deadlines for withdrawals."The United states citizens long ago lost faith inside the president's leadership of the war in Iraq because his rhetoric hasn't matched the reality on the floor," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "The choices between a Democratic plan for responsible redeployment as well as the president's plan for an endless war in Iraq."Majority Democrats in Congress are unable to muster enough votes to just make an end to the war. So that they are hoping to win Republican support with legislation to limit the mission of U.S. forces to training Iraq's military and police, protecting U.S. assets and fighting terrorists."Democrats are aware that they do not at this point contain the votes in the Senate to make the president to go faster," Schieffer told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric. While we're talking about America's frustration using the protracted war, the president said, "Some repeat the gains we are making in Iraq come too late. They are mistaken. It's rarely too late to deal a blow to al Qaeda. It's rarely too late to advance freedom. Which is never too late to support our troops within a fight they can win.""Whatever political party you fit in with, whatever your position on Iraq, you should be able to agree that America carries a vital interest in preventing chaos and providing hope in the center East," obama said.He added, "Let us bond on a policy of strength in the center East." no previous page next 1/2 mulberry east west bayswater
Chinese police Tuesday dragged away a lot more than 100 parents protesting the deaths with their children in poorly constructed schools that collapsed in last month's earthquake.The mother and father, many holding pictures of the dead children, were pulled across town away from a courthouse in Dujiangyan, a resort city northwest of the Sichuan provincial capital of Chengdu."Why?" many of them yelled. "Tell us something," they said as black-suited police wearing riot helmets yanked their way.The parents had been kneeling in front of the courthouse yelling, "We desire to sue." Their children attended a high school in Juyuan, near Dujiangyan, where 270 students died. The Southern Metropolis News quoted a rescuer as saying a few weeks ago that rubble in the school showed that no steel reinforcing bars have been used in construction, only iron wire."The parents were here to offer their report to the judge," said one police officer who refused to provide his name.Calls to local police are not answered Tuesday.Accusations that students died within the May 12 earthquake as a result of shoddy school construction have galvanized anger and grabbed the public's attention, and in addition worried the government.President Hu Jintao and other top leaders have been shown repeatedly on state television visiting children in makeshift schools.The government says the May 12 earthquake destroyed 7,000 classrooms.Many parents have accused contractors of techniques when building the classrooms, leading to schools that could not withstand the 7.9-magnitude quake. Pictures of collapsed schools surrounded by buildings still standing have fueled anger.Tuesday's protest happened while Chinese leader Li Changchun, the nation's fifth-ranked ruler, was touring other parts of the city. A state Xinhua News Agency said Li was checking heritage sites damaged in the earthquake.An official in the foreign affairs office of the local government, Zao Ming, said, "this is not an good place to do interviews. ... In a disaster like this, there will be a lot of opinions. The us government will solve their problems."There were several Japanese reporters in the courthouse. One witness said the police told the parents "the Japanese are reporting bad aspects of you." The witness asked to never be identified for anxiety about reprisals by authorities.An Associated Press reporter and two photographers covering the protest were forcibly dragged by the arms in the steps into the courthouse by police trying to prevent them from seeing the demonstration. These were held inside, in addition to two Japanese reporters, and questioned for a half-hour before being let go, following your protesters had been moved away.Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Tuesday that this government had been unusually open about allowing journalists to directory of the earthquake as well as aftermath. He told a news conference in Beijing that this "principle of transparency and openness remains unchanged."He said local authorities were selection based on the conditions in the disaster zone, though "they are not trying to block any news in order to make difficulties for the reporters."The confirmed death toll for China's worst disaster in three decades was raised Tuesday to 69,107, a growth of about 90 from the previous day, using more than 18,200 people still missing, the us government said. The quake also left 5 million people homeless.Meanwhile, Xinhua said authorities have delayed for 2 days a bid to divert water from a huge lake formed if the quake sent landslides tumbling in to a river in northern Sichuan.Water levels within the lake had been rising steadily and threatened to flood surrounding areas, prompting authorities to evacuate nearly 200,000 people already uprooted by the quake.But Xinhua said with little rain forecast for one more several days, rescue workers just weren't likely to start draining over water until Thursday. The task had been expected to start Tuesday.Workers have previously used heavy earth-moving equipment to dig a runoff channel to remove the water. The government is anxious the newly formed lake could burst, sending a wall of water through a valley.In a indication of how difficult rescue conditions are in parts of Sichuan, there is certainly still no symbol of a helicopter that crashed greater than three days ago while ferrying survivors. 1000s of soldiers have combed remote mountains seeking the military helicopter.The Russian-designed Mi-171 transport was carrying 19 people, 14 of them people injured inside the quake, when it flew into fog and turbulence and crashed Saturday nearby the epicenter of the quake within the town of Wenchuan, state media reported. ugg sunburst
Parents who survive to 85 or older bequeath heart healthto their descendants, a long-term study shows. That's very good news for the rare person who has two exceptionally long-livedparents. Yet it's also good news through out us. Why? At approximately age 40, the study shows, children of long-lived parents smokeless, have lower blood pressure level, and have lower cholesterol levels than similaradults whose parents died before age 85. This means they are at reduced riskof heart disease and stroke. And there's a lot the rest of us are able to do about those risk factors, says studyresearcher Daniel Levy, MD, director from the Framingham Heart Study and ascientist at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. "Modifying these risk factors will increase your probability of survivingto old age without heart problems, which is the No. 1 killer of both men andwomen," Levy tells WebMD. "If we will eliminate high blood pressure,eliminate high-cholesterol, and eliminate cigarette smoking, we wouldeliminate about 90% of heart disease." Levy and colleagues at Boston University discovered that at the average age of40, individuals who had two parents survive to 85 or older had fewer heart-diseaserisk factors than did people with parents who died before age 85. And over 12 years of follow-up, children of long-lived parents had asignificantly slower boost in heart disease risk. Having just one long-livedparent also did actually slow progression of coronary disease risk -- but not nearlyas almost as much ast having two parents who reached age 85. Will You Survive to 85? Levy stresses by using a healthy lifestyle -- and, perhaps, a bit helpfrom your doctor -- you can have one's heart disease risk profile of someonewhose parents lived long lives. But you may not be able to match these genetically gifted individuals inlife span, suggests Clyde B. Schechter, MD, associate professor of epidemiologyand population health at Albert Einstein College of drugs in Bronx, N.Y. "You do not have much chance of making it to 95 or 100 unless yourparents did, regardless of what you do," Schechter tells WebMD. "For thecommon man, genetic background isn't as important as behavior. There exists a lotyou can do to determine how much time you will live. But those ideas will get youfrom 65 to 85 -- to never 95." In that case, why look at the few people who haveinherited longevity? For clues, Levy and Schechter say. Those two researches -- and many others -- are attempting to pinpoint thegenes and genetic factors linked to long life. That actually work has only justbegun. "If we can track down the specific genes, and how they work, that maysomeday cause discoveries of new strategies to preventing heart disease,"Schechter says. "But products or new things people can do to makethemselves metabolically seem like people who live on the ripe old age of 100-- that is the couple of decades away." Meanwhile, Levy says, we have been lucky to live at a time when so much is knownabout staying healthy and living longer. "At the turn with the 20th century, the leading causes of death wereinfectious diseases. Tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera -- those kinds of thingsclaimed more lives than everything else," he says. "Since the midpoint ofthe Twentieth century, the leading cause of death has been heart disease. Ourgrandparents couldn't do much to alter the risk factors associated with lifeexpectancy. But for us, today, that's an easy task." The analysis, by Dellara F. Terry, MD; Levy; and colleagues appears in theMarch 12 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine . An editorial bySchechter accompanies the study.By Reviewed by Louise ChangB)2005-2006 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved bayswater mulberry
[url=http://www.ahlborn-kirchenorgeln.com/uggspascher.html]ugg australia[/url]
|
| |
|
|
